Vicarious traumatization in the general public, members, and non-members of medical teams aiding in COVID-19 control
By Zhenyu Li, Jingwu Ge, Meiling Yang, Jianping Feng, Mei Qiao, Riyue Jiang, Jiangjiang Bi, Gaofeng Zhan, Xiaolin Xu, Long Wang and 14 more. medRxiv, 2020
1,010 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Since December 2019, more than 79,000 people have been diagnosed with infection of the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). A large number of medical staff were dispersed for Wuhan city and Hubei province to aid COVID-19 control. Psychological stress, especially vicarious traumatization (VT) caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, should not be ignored. To address this concern, the study employed a total of 214 general public (GP) and 526 nurses to evaluate VT scores via a mobile app-based questionnaire. Results showed that the VT scores slightly increased across periods of aiding COVID-19 control, although no statistical difference was noted (P = 0.083). However, the study found lower scores for VT in nurses [median = 69; interquartile range (IQR) = 56-85] than those of the GP (median = 75.5; IQR = 62-88.3) (P = 0.017). In addition, the VT scores for front-line nurses (FLNs; median = 64; IQR = 52-75), including scores for physiological and psychological responses, were significantly lower than those of non-front-line nurses (nFLNs; median = 75.5; IQR = 63-92) (P < 0.001). Interestingly, the VT scores of the GP were significantly higher than those of the FLNs (P < 0.001). However, no statistical difference was observed compared with those of nFLNs (P > 0.05). Importantly, nFLNs are more likely to suffer from VT, which might be related to two factors, namely, gender [odds ratio (OR) = 3.1717; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.247-18.808; P = 0.002] and fertility [OR = 2.072; 95%CI = 0.626-24.533; P = 0.039]. Therefore, increased attention should be paid to the psychological problems of the medical staff, especially nFLNs, and GP under the situation of the spread and control of COVID-19. Early strategies that aim to prevent and treat VT in medical staff and GP are extremely necessary.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9824bfce21ae0ff7f92700c9071fc4e4559e4c5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- R. O’Connor
- Carol Worthman
- B. A. Jones
- M. Bowe
- Helen Christensen
- Tamsin Ford
- Susan Michie
- Andrew K. Przybylski
Citations in the corpus
- Psychosocial impact of COVID-19 (2020, neutral): “Another large population based survey from China comprising almost 53,000 respondents found that more than 1/3rd (~35”
- The mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: A rapid systematic review (2020, positive): “We also identified two systematic reviews 29 ,31 , which identified five primary studies 8 ,35 ,39 ,47 ,76 .”
- The mental health benefits of community helping during crisis: Coordinated helping, community identification and sense of unity during the COVID‐19 pandemic (2021, background): “Fear of COVID-19 has been found to predict depression beyond the impact of pre-existing vulnerabilities and socio-demographics factors (Lee et al., 2020), and those who come in to contact with COVID-19 are also at risk of pandemic-related vicarious traumatization (Z. Li et al., 2020).”
- COVID-19 and mental health: A review of the existing literature (2020, background): “Four studies, all from Chinese centres, examined the frequency of specific mental health-related variables in persons affected by the COVID-19 outbreak Xiao et al., 2020a; Li et al., 2020; Xiao et al., 2020b) .”
- Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health Care Workers in Singapore (2020, background): “nificantly lower vicarious traumatization scores than non– frontline nurses and the general public (5).”
- A longitudinal study on the mental health of general population during the COVID-19 epidemic in China (2020, neutral): “6 As a result, governments and public health authorities urgently need guidance and actionable information on effective public health and psychological interventions that can safeguard the mental health of the general public.”
- Prioritizing the Mental Health and Well-Being of Healthcare Workers: An Urgent Global Public Health Priority (2021, background): “(38), utilizing a mobile phone app-based questionnaire, found evidence of vicarious traumatization in the general public (n = 214), frontline nurses (n = 234), and non-frontline nurses (n = 292) aiding in COVID-19 control during the outbreak in China in February 2020.”
- A multinational, multicentre study on the psychological outcomes and associated physical symptoms amongst healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak (2020, positive): “Our findings mirror the trend in recent studies on the psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic among the general population in China during its initial stages (Wang et al., 2020a; Li et al., 2020; Kang et al., 2019).”
- Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science (2020, background): “15 The pandemic intersects with rising mental health issues in childhood and adolescence.”