Politics, institutions, and fiscal performance in a federal system: an analysis of the Argentine provinces

By M. Jones, Pablo Sanguinetti, M. Tommasi. 2000

218 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e94f42c4eff0f3e5d14a783fb79f3e5cf565c980

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Erik Wibbels
2. Jonathan Rodden
3. Barry R. Weingast
4. John Ashworth
5. Ernesto Schargrodsky
6. Benny Geys
7. Paul J. Gertler
8. F. Stewart

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Erik Wibbels
2. Jonathan Rodden
3. Barry R. Weingast
4. Kent Eaton
5. Tyler Dickovick
6. John Ashworth
7. Ernesto Schargrodsky
8. Benny Geys

Citations in the corpus

• Decentralization and Human Development in Argentina (2003, background): “See, in particular, Saiegh and Tommassi (1998), and Jones et al. (1997), Presman and Lucioni (1997), and FIEL (1993).”
• School decentralization: Helping the good get better, but leaving the poor behind (2008, methodology): “10 For a description of Argentine fiscal structure see Jones et al (2000).”
• The Politics of Re-centralization in Argentina and Brazil (2004, background): “These transfers have loomed large in the study of Argentine intergovernmental relations ever since (Gibson and Calvo 2000; Remmer and Wibbels 2000; Jones, Sanguinetti, and Tommasi 2000).”
• Government Weakness and Local Public Debt Development in Flemish Municipalities (2005, methodology): “We consider this by employing the tests of Kao (1999).12 The results of the cointegration tests are given in Table 3.”
• MADISON IN BAGHDAD?: Decentralization and Federalism in Comparative Politics (2006, background): “…on transfers to finance regional spending experience poorer fiscal performance (Rodden & Wibbels 2002), and case study evidence from Argentina (Jones et al. 2000), India (Khemani 2001), and Germany (Rodden 2005) suggests that those regions most dependent on transfers within federations run…”
• The Dilemma of Fiscal Federalism: Grants and Fiscal Performance around the World (2002, background): “On Argentina see Jones, et al. (2000) Another path to fiscal discipline is found in the upper left-hand cell of Figure 1.”
• The Political Economy of Privatization and Competition: Cross-Country Evidence from the Telecommunications Sector (2002, unknown): “Submitted 14 March 2001”
• Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives (2009, background): “…(F3) directly hinders competition among jurisdictions, so that subnational governments 14 See, for example, Filippov et al. (2003), Chhibber and Kollman (2004), Dillinger and Webb (1999), Enikolopov and Zhuravskaya (2002), Garman et al. (2000), Rodden and Wibbles (2002), and Tommasi et al. (2000).”