Industrial Policy: Growth Elixir or Poison?

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States: Northeast and Southeast Asia in Comparative Perspective (2005, background): “…and that which is required to construct a developmental state+11 Unless political leaders are confronted by all three of these constraints at the same time, we 5+ Pack 2000, 64+ See also World Bank 1993, 6; and Page 1994+ 6+ See Bates 1995; and Knight 1992+ 7+ Geddes 1994+ 8+ Moe 1984+ 9+ On…”
Is There a Case for Industrial Policy? A Critical Survey (2006, unknown): “Pack (2000) follows a different strategy, assuming that total factor productivity increased in favored manufacturing sectors in both Japan and the Republic of Korea and estimates how much of an impact even an assumed successful policy could have had on the growth of gross domestic product.”
Trade and Growth: Reconciling the Macroeconomic and Microeconomic Evidence (2005, unknown): “Dollar and Sokoloff (1990) and Pack (2000) have found that TFP growth in Korean manufacturing has been extraordinarily high compared with other countries.”
The Case for Industrial Policy: A Critical Survey (2006, unknown): “Pack (2000) follows a different strategy, assuming that TFP in favored manufacturing sectors was in fact increased in both Japan and Korea and estimates how much of an impact even an assumed successful policy could have had on the growth of gross domestic product.”