The placebo effect: dissolving the expectancy versus conditioning debate.

By Steve Stewart-Williams, John Podd. Psychological bulletin, 2004

692 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The authors review the literature on the 2 main models of the placebo effect: expectancy theory and classical conditioning. A path is suggested to dissolving the theoretical impasse that has long plagued this issue. The key is to make a clear distinction between 2 questions: What factors shape placebo effects? and What learning mediates the placebo effect? The reviewed literature suggests that classical conditioning procedures are one shaping factor but that verbal information can also shape placebo effects. The literature also suggests that conditioning procedures and other sources of information sometimes shape conscious expectancies and that these expectancies mediate some placebo effects; however, in other cases conditioning procedures appear to shape placebo effects that are not mediated by conscious cognition.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Health Information Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8fb1e7a4b4a511bd4465b077a06591ed615f76e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Maryanne Garry
  2. Irving Kirsch
  3. K. G. Karahalios
  4. Motahhare Eslami
  5. R. Michael
  6. Mark Chaves

In Health Information Management

  1. Mark Chaves

Citations in the corpus