Effects of trade liberalization on the gender wage gap in Mexico
By Raquel Artecona, W. Cunningham. 2002
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8f4302a783a9252383ddba1996f9d9f41b48784
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Indra de Soysa
- Eric Neumayer
- Edward Anderson
- C. Grown
- R. Oostendorp
- S. Seguino
- N. Kabeer
- Stephan Klasen
Citations in the corpus
- Gender equity and globalization: Macroeconomic policy for developing countries (2006, background): “Semi-industrialized economies are attempting ‘immiserizing growth’ which results from over-reliance on low-tech manufacturing goods that have taken on the pricing characteristics of primary commodities—that is, with declining terms of trade.”
- Did Trade Liberalization Help Women? the Case of Mexico in the 1990s (2010, unknown): “Artecona and Cunningham (2002) employ the same methods for Mexico but do not find a significant relationship between tariff changes and reductions in the gender wage gap across industries.”
- Openness and inequality in developing countries: a review of theory and recent evidence (2005, background): “Rama (2001) finds that the gender gap in earnings (controlling for educational attainment and work experience) declined from 39% to 26% in Vietnam during the 1990s (a period of trade liberalization), while Artecona and Cunningham (2001) report a similar change associated with trade liberalization in”
- Globalization and the Gender Wage Gap (2004, background): “García-Cuéllar (2000) and Artecona and Cunningham (2002), using data on Mexican wages, find that the gender gap decreased more in industries that were more affected by trade (in terms of import licenses’ reductions or import penetration) than in other industries. Berik, van der Meulen Rodgers and Zv”
- Globalisation, Women's Economic Rights and Forced Labour (2007, background): “Artecona and Cunningham (2002) find the same for Mexico, but the effect is not statistically significant at conventional levels, as already noted above.”