Genetic improvement trends in agronomic performances and end-use quality characteristics among hard red winter wheat cultivars in Nebraska

By H. Fufa, P. Stephen Baenziger, B. Beecher, R. Graybosch, K. Eskridge, L. Nelson. Euphytica, 2005

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparison of phenotypic and molecular marker-based classifications of hard red winter wheat cultivars (2005, methodology): “Field evaluation, morphological and end-use quality characterization The 30 cultivars were grown at Lincoln, Mead and North Platte, Nebraska during the 2002 and 2003 seasons (described in detail in Fufa et al., 2005).”
Effects of the Chromosome Region Including the Gpc‐B1 Locus on Wheat Grain and Protein Yield (2010, background): “94 WWW.CROPS.ORG CROP SCIENCE, VOL. 50, JANUARY–FEBRUARY 2010 diff erent release periods have shown that modern cultivars have reduced GPC compared to older cultivars (Austin et al., 1980; Slafer et al., 1990; Fufa et al., 2005).”
Genetic improvement effects on yield stability in durum wheat genotypes grown in Italy (2010, background): “It has been suggested that modern wheat cultivars are more responsive to changes in environmental conditions than their older counterparts (Slafer and Kernich, 1996; Fufa et al., 2005).”
Genetic improvement in winter wheat yields in the Great Plains of North America, 1959-2008. (2010, methodology): “Fufa et al. (2005) used a similar approach with Nebraska-adapted winter wheats, and arrived at a similar estimate for genetic gain in grain yield of 0.48% yr–1.”