Integration of multiple predator cues by the crayfish Orconectes propinquus

By P. Bouwma, B. Hazlett. 2001

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

DIFFERENCES IN MEMORY CAPABILITIES IN INVASIVE AND NATIVE CRAYFISH (2002, background): “Similar patterns of the depression of feeding responses by detection of the odour of real predators have been reported for other species of crayfish (Blake and Hart, 1993; Hazlett and Schoolmaster, 1998; Hazlett, 1999; Bouwma and Hazlett, 2001).”
Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectusThe present review is one in the special series of reviews on animal–plant interactions. (2010, unknown): “…have reported all-or-nothing responses to gradients of conspecific alarm cues: northern clearwater crayfish (Orconectes propinquus (Girard, 1852)) (Bouwma and Hazlett 2001; but see Tomba et al. 2001), convict cichlids (Roh et al. 2004), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Mirza and Chivers…”
Phenotypic modifications to conspecific density arising from predation risk assessment (2003, unknown): “to injured, disturbed, or killed conspecifics) in the absence of any possible direct predator assessment (Levri 1998, Jacobson and Stabell 1999, Kiesecker et al. 1999, Belden et al. 2000, Hazlett and McLay 2000, Bouwma and Hazlett 2001, Bryer et al. 2001, reviewed in Chivers and Smith 1998, Kats a”