DIFFERENCES IN MEMORY CAPABILITIES IN INVASIVE AND NATIVE CRAYFISH

By B. Hazlett, Patrizia Acquistapace, Francesca Gherardi. 2002

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c924586cf469c60cb18913b17bc8413a34cfd495

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Weis
2. Elena Tricarico
3. L. Aquiloni
4. Giuseppe Mazza
5. Elena Cecchinelli
6. Sara Brusconi
7. A. Paglianti
8. Francesca Gherardi

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Weis
2. Giuseppe Mazza
3. Francesca Gherardi

Citations in the corpus

• Biological control of invasive populations of crayfish: the European eel (Anguilla anguilla) as a predator of Procambarus clarkii (2010, result): “On the contrary, as shown by Hazlett et al. (2002) , adults of P. clarkii are able to associate the odour of a novel fish species even if herbivorous, e.g.”
• The role of behavior in the success of invasive crustaceans (2010, background): “Hazlett et al. (2002) investigated memory in invasive (O. rusticus and P. clarkii) and native (O. virilis and Austropatmobius pallipes) crayfish, respectively, using a conspecific alarm odor and a novel odor (goldfish odor).”
• Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectusThe present review is one in the special series of reviews on animal–plant interactions. (2010, unknown): “Hazlett et al. (2002) conditioned four different species of crayfish — two native and two exotic species — and found that exotic species retained the responses for longer periods of time than the native species.”