Differences and similarities between born globals and other types of exporters

By T. Madsen, E. Rasmussen, Per Servais. 2000

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8bc99b8f37adfe6fce0333b3c7dc17db02ed483

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. G. Knight
2. Piotr Dzikowski
3. R. Jack
4. Murray Taylor
5. T. Madsen
6. A. Rialp
7. J. Rialp
8. Arild Aspelund

In Strategy and Management

1. Piotr Dzikowski
2. G. Knight
3. Lianxi Zhou
4. T. Madsen
5. R. Jack
6. Murray Taylor
7. A. Rialp
8. J. Rialp

Citations in the corpus

• A bibliometric analysis of born global firms (2018, background): “Madsen, Rasmussen, and Servais (2000) define BGs as firms having a high share of foreign sales (almost 70%).”
• A review of the foundation, international marketing strategies, and performance of international new ventures (2007, background): “In particular, INVs represent a considerate portion of firms in small, open economies (Madsen et al., 2000; Moen, 2002; McNaughton, 2003).”
• International new ventures: revisiting the influences behind the ‘born-global’ firm (2007, background): “Knight (1997) and Madsen et al. (2000) define ‘bornglobals’ as firms with at least 25% of their sales to foreign countries within 3 years after their inception (after 1976).”
• International commitment, post-entry growth and survival of international new ventures (2014, background): “‘born globals’ as defined in some other studies (Rennie, 1993; Knight, 1996; Aspelund and Moen, 2005; Madsen et al., 2006).”
• Understanding the pace, scale and pattern of firm internationalization: An extension of the ‘born global’ concept (2013, background): “(Continued) concerning born global firms, which revealed that a major factor in born global internationalization was the domestic market’s inability to meet the survival or growth needs of the firm (Crick and Jones, 2000; Madsen et al., 2000; Moen, 2002; Oviatt and McDougall, 1994).”
• The phenomenon of early internationalizing firms: what do we know after a decade (1993-2003) of scientific inquiry? (2005, background): “However, consistent research programs recently developed in countries such as Denmark, Norway, and the US reveal that the existence and further development of early internationalizing ventures or born-globals are phenomena not necessarily attached to new, high-tech sectors (Aspelund & Moen, 2001; Ma”