Form follows function

By Ralf Seppelt, Brian D. Fath, Benjamin Burkhard, Judy Fisher, Adrienne Grêt-Regamey, Sven Lautenbach, P. Pert, S. Hotes, J. Spangenberg, Peter H. Verburg and 1 more. 2012

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8bbb0c1709a348dcc516ea054eb6b45fc5745c5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration (2016, background): “Different frameworks can be adapted by different schools, groups, and disciplines based on data availability (cf. Boyd and Banzhaf, 2007; Carpenter et al., 2009; Fisher et al., 2009; Sukhdev and Kumar, 2010; Seppelt et al., 2011, 2012).”
Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: a decision tree approach (2017, background): “There are also a few academic papers related to general guidance for ecosystem service assessment (e.g. Gómez-Baggethun et al., 2016; Jacobs et al., 2016; Pascual et al., 2016; Seppelt et al., 2012).”
Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services (2012, background): “Several ideas were proposed for a better taxonomy and classification of ecosystem services, because there is still no consensus on a common strategy (Seppelt et al., 2012; Burkhard et al., 2012).”
Synergies, Trade-offs, and Losses of Ecosystem Services in Urban Regions: an Integrated Multiscale Framework Applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany (2012, background): “Few studies have integrated different ecosystem services in their analyses (Seppelt et al. 2011a).”
Ecosystem services assessment: A review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective (2014, background): “Finally, as highlighted by everal authors, there is a need for more standardized frameworks or ecosystem services assessments in order to overcome inconsisencies in definitions and assessment methods, and allow proper omparisons (Crossman et al., 2013; Edens and Hein, 2013; Maes t al., 2012; Martín-”
Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification (2014, unknown): “Major challenges in all ecosystem service assessment efforts are the high complexity of the topic itself and the need for universal and rather easy-to-apply approaches (Crossman et al. 2013, Seppelt et al. 2012).”