Random utility models with implicit availability/perception of choice alternatives for the simulation of travel demand

By E. Cascetta, A. Papola. 2001

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Choice set generation in spatial contexts: a review (2009, background): “Later, Cascetta and Papola (2001) arrived at a similar model specification.”
Route choice modeling: past, present and future research directions (2009, background): “Cascetta and Papola (2001) propose the concept of implicit availability perception within a Logit model structure, by considering that travelers could be unaware of some alternatives and modeling the availability of alternatives as a function of travelers’ characteristic.”
The constrained multinomial logit: A semi-compensatory choice model (2009, methodology): “The appeal of this approach is that it permits different models to simulate the phenomena associated with each stage (Cascetta and Papola, 2001), but it is computationally complex because the number of possible choice sets explodes with the number of alternatives, with a maximum of 2 1 choice sets f”
STOCHASTIC ROUTE CHOICE SET GENERATION: BEHAVIORAL AND PROBABILISTIC FOUNDATIONS (2007, methodology): “Well-known in this respect are for example the labeling approach of Ben-Akiva et al. (1984) and the implicit-availability approach of Cascetta and Papola (2001).”