Accounting for the value of ecosystem services

By Richard B. Howarth, S. Farber. 2002

306 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e85d61cf95e53ef1371da7987a4752dd0388d831

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

The Concept of Ecosystem Services Regarding Landscape Research: A Review (2011, background): “Since the last two decades many publications have dealt with different interpretations and implementations of the term “value” in the context of ecosystem services (e.g. Costanza et al., 1997; Bishop, J.T., ed., 1999; Odum and Odum, 2000; Howarth and Farber, 2002; Chee, 2004; Farber et al., 2006; Ku”
Changes in the global value of ecosystem services (2014, unknown): “virtual total expenditures that should not be exceeded (Costanza et al., 1998; Howarth and Farber, 2002).”
Economic Growth Quality, Environmental Sustainability, and Social Welfare in China - Provincial Assessment Based on Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) (2019, background): “Stymne and Jackson (2000) and Howarth and Kennedy (2016) argued that the Atkinson index should be used in the GPI valuation to measure the welfare losses caused by economic inequality. Makino (2008), Jackson et al.”
Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments (2011, methodology): “…literature regarding the implementation of such analyses (see, for example, Bockstael et al. 2000; Balmford et al. 2002; De Groot et al. 2002; Howarth and Farber, 2002; Heal et al., 2005; Barbier, 2007; Boyd and Banzhaf, 2007; Wallace, 2007; Finnoff and Tschirhart, 2008; Fisher et al., 2008;…”
Valuing ecosystem goods and services: a new approach using a surrogate market and the combination of a multiple criteria analysis and a Delphi panel to assign weights to the attributes (2004, methodology): “The pluralistic approach taken in this research is supported by the literature in ecological economics, where ‘valuation, ecological assessment and equity analysis are properly viewed as complements, not substitutes’ (Howarth and Farber, 2002: 428).”
Valuation of the ecosystem services: A psycho-cultural perspective (2008, unknown): “…Goulder and Kennedy, 1997; Costanza et al., 1997; Bishop, 1999; Barbier, 2000; Chee, 2004; Dasgupta et al., 2000; Spash, 2000; O'Neill and Spash, 2000; Howarth and Farber, 2000; McCracken and Abza, 2001; Spash, 2002; Freeman, 2003; Pagiola et al., 2004; Farber et al., 2006; Spash and Vatn, 2006).”
A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration (2016, background): “Most aggregates are “accounting measures” of the quantity of cosystem services (Howarth and Farber, 2002).”
What have economists learned about valuing nature? A review essay (2013, background): “The economic value of ecosystem services does not necessarily capture values such as ecological sustainability and distributional fairness (Howarth and Farber, 2002; MEA, 2003).”