Visible Acts of Meaning

By Janet Beavin Bavelas, Nicole Chovil. 2000

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e83dc95b29fb29358c2f0b3f3251aa3bd165a6a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Linda Coates
2. Trudy Johnson
3. J. Gerwing
4. D. Prévost
5. Janet Beavin Bavelas
6. C. Sutton
7. J. E. Fox Tree
8. Jackson Tolins

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Linda Coates
2. Trudy Johnson
3. J. Gerwing
4. D. Prévost
5. Janet Beavin Bavelas
6. C. Sutton

In Language and Linguistics

1. Linda Coates
2. J. Gerwing
3. Trudy Johnson
4. D. Prévost
5. Janet Beavin Bavelas
6. C. Sutton
7. J. E. Fox Tree
8. Jackson Tolins

Citations in the corpus

• Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. (2002, unknown): “They include certain head nods, eye gaze, smiles, over-speech laughter, grimaces, iconic gestures, and pointing (Bavelas & Chovil, 2000; Bavelas, Chovil, Lawrie, & Wade, 1992; Goodwin, 1981; Goodwin & Goodwin, 1986).”
• Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility. (2008, background): “This allocation of information is consistent with models that propose that language use in face-to-face dialogue comprises integrated messages ( Bavelas & Chovil, 2000, 2006 )o rcomposite signals (Clark, 1996).”
• Listener Responses as a Collaborative Process: The Role of Gaze (2002, methodology): “As it was used in this specific context, speaker gaze fits the four criteria required for a visible act of meaning ( Bavelas & Chovil, 2000 ): 1. It is sensitive to the availability of a receiver in that the speaker uses the listener’s typical gaze pattern to create the gaze window.”