Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis

By M. Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, S. Yates. 2001

1,119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e81194700e924dc0899281040f5c8de59d1c7222

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Recreational cultural ecosystem services: How do people describe the value? (2017, unknown): “We borrowed the concept of interpretative repertoires from discursive psychology (Wetherell et al., 2001), also rooted in symbolic interactionism, to identify which ideas, notions, and metaphors participants drew on to articulate their experiences and express their values of nature.”
Discourse analysis and psychotherapy: A critical review (2007, background): “3), and it adopts a social constructionist view of language as context-bound, functional and constructive (for introductions to the notion of discourse and discourse analysis, see Mills, 1997 ; Van Dijk, 1997 ; Wetherell, Taylor, & Yates, 2001a , 2001b ).”
‘Older people’ talking as if they are not older people: Positioning theory as an explanation (2006, background): “This paper draws particularly on what is sometimes described as ‘critical discursive psychology’ (Edley 2001; Edley and Wetherell 2001; Wetherell 1998) which combines the characteristic discursive interest in what participants themselves treat as relevant with more ethnographic and…”
Comparing qualitative research methodologies for systemic research: the use of grounded theory, discourse analysis and narrative analysis (2005, background): “Discursive analytic methodologies, of which there are now a variety (see Wetherell et al. (2001a, 2001b) for a recent overview) offer rigorous tools to examine language and its use, always the central concern of systemic narrative therapists.”
Discursive Psychology: Between Method and Paradigm (2003, background): “…when treated as a singular thing without appreciating the consequences of its diversity (which is easily seen in the range of current overviews available: e.g. Jaworski and Coupland, 1999; Phillips and Jorgenson, 2002; Schiffrin, 1994; van Dijk, 1997; Wetherell et al., 2001; Wood and Kroger, 2000).”
Talking about work stress: Discourse analysis and implications for stress interventions (2005, methodology): “However, some discourses are more available than others, and may be easier to ‘say’ (Wetherell et al., 2001), such as the stress discourse.”
Alcohol Consumption, Gender Identities and Women’s Changing Social Positions (2008, background): “Discourse analysis is a methodological approach which is now well-established in critical social psychology (Parker 1992; Wetherell et al. 2001), having been introduced into Anglo-American psychology in the late 1970s (Willig 2001).”