Economic Development and Transition: Thought, Strategy, and Viability

By J. Lin. 2009

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e80ddd2f3947cb759393a7558e95b22af99252cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development (2010, unknown): “improvements of soft and hard infrastructures, the government in a developing country, like that in a developed country, needs to compensate for the information externalities generated by pioneer firms (Rodrik 2004; Lin 2009a; Lin and Monga 2011; Harrison and Rodrı́guez-Clare 2010).”
Growth Identification and Facilitation: The Role of the State in the Dynamics of Structural Change (2010, unknown): “Alternatively, if the government’s goal is to support the development of industries that go against the country’s comparative advantages, the firms in the targeted industries will not be viable in competitive markets and the required subsidies and protections for the firms will be large, which are l”
A Model of China's State Capitalism (2015, unknown): “or equivalently (1 )K0 + Z log R2 e Rp1(i)di = (1 ) 2 + W2 R2 : (19) (17) implies R2 e R = R1K0 (1 ) 1 + W1.”
New Structural Economics : A Framework for Rethinking Development (2011, unknown): “…nloaded from improvements of soft and hard infrastructures, the government in a developing country, like that in a developed country, needs to compensate for the information externalities generated by pioneer firms (Rodrik 2004; Lin 2009a; Lin and Monga 2011; Harrison and Rodrı́guez-Clare 2010).7”
Demystifying the Chinese Economy (2011, unknown): “…the industries on the governments’ priority lists were the latent comparative advantages of the three countries (Lin and Monga 2010b). shortages, and the government was obliged to use administrative measures to mobilize and allocate resources directly to nonviable firms (Lin 2009; Lin and Li 2009).”
Should Industrial Policy in Developing Countries Conform to Comparative Advantage or Defy it? A Debate Between Justin Lin and Ha‐Joon Chang (2009, unknown): “As I have argued in my Marshall Lectures (Lin, 2009), industrial strategies of the often newly-independent developing countries in the 1950s and 1960s were informed by incorrect perceptions of the binding constraints on development.”
Can Developing Countries Gain from Defying Comparative Advantage? Distance to Comparative Advantage, Export Diversification and Sophistication, and the Dynamics of Specialization (2018, methodology): “By extending and computing the Technological Complexity Index proposed by Lin (2009) to assess the distance to comparative advantage, we find that developing countries which defy their comparative advantage tend to diversify and increase the sophistication of their exports more than countries…”