Should Industrial Policy in Developing Countries Conform to Comparative Advantage or Defy it? A Debate Between Justin Lin and Ha‐Joon Chang
By J. Lin, Ha-Joon Chang. 2009
604 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7668a6a93dc77e1c85cb57670dcbcfb1ef83d6b7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Political Science and International Relations
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Industrial Policy: Can We Go Beyond an Unproductive Confrontation? (2010, neutral): “to adjustment costs (on these issues, see Lin and Chang 2009; Dosi, Cimoli and Stiglitz (eds.)”
- New Structural Economics : A Framework for Rethinking Development (2011, neutral): “This only happens in an economy with competitive markets (Lin 2009a; Lin and Chang 2009).”
- Economic Diversification in the GCC:Past, Present, and Future (2014, neutral): “The bigger the technological push in entering a new sector, the bigger the risk for private sector firms (Rodrik 2005; Lin and Chang 2009).”
- Industrial Policy in the 21st Century (2020, background): “…the old-style industrial policy, especially tariff protection, the mere fact that they have explicitly supported industrial policy has opened the possibility for the debate to be far less ideological and thus more productive (see Lin and Chang, 2009, for an example of a less ideological debate).”
- Return of industrial policy? (2012, neutral): “(Lin and Chang 2009) The underlying argument seems to be that we know that Japan and Korea succeeded in the given industries, therefore those industries must have been within their existing comparative advantage.”
- What Do State-Owned Development Banks Do? Evidence from BNDES, 2002–09 (2015, background): “On the other hand, development banks may influence firms with latent advantages; that is, firms with valuable projects and activities that were not sufficiently developed due to lack of capital and complementary investments (e.g. Lin & Chang, 2009; Rodrik, 1995).”