Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics.
By Nick Goldman, Jon P. Anderson, Allen G. Rodrigo. Systematic Biology, 2000
1,100 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Paleontology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7bba8744b6e9989567708ac45513912d714b163
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
- Olivier Gascuel
- Alexandros Stamatakis
- Jean-François Dufayard
- Maria Anisimova
- Vincent Lefort
- Stéphane Guindon
- Derrick J. Zwickl
- Bui Quang Minh
In Molecular Biology
- Olivier Gascuel
- Alexandros Stamatakis
- Jean-François Dufayard
- Maria Anisimova
- Vincent Lefort
- Stéphane Guindon
- Derrick J. Zwickl
- Bui Quang Minh
In Paleontology
- Jacques Rougemont
- Paul Hoover
- Derrick J. Zwickl
- M. Springer
- Olivier Gascuel
- Maria Anisimova
- Jean-François Dufayard
- Vincent Lefort
Citations in the corpus
- Molecular Studies and Phylogeography of Amazonian Tetrapods and their Relation to Geological and Climatic Models (2010, methodology): “Statistical tests of topology include the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test (Templeton 1983) under a parsimony framework, the Shimodaira–Hasegawa test (Shimodaira & Hasegawa 1999) under the maximum likelihood criterion, and the parametric bootstrap (Goldman et al. 2000).”
- Phylogenetic analysis of Tylenchida Thorne, 1949 as inferred from D2 and D3 expansion fragments of the 28S rRNA gene sequences (2006, methodology): “It has been shown that the SH test is more appropriate than the KH test for comparing multiple trees (Goldman et al., 2000).”
- Phylogenetic analysis of morphology in Prunus reveals extensive homoplasy (2006, result): “Although we are not aware of studies that compare the performance of the Templeton test with other tests of topology, the SH test has been shown to be conservative ( Goldman et al. 2000, Buckley 2002) when compared to other methodologies used to test topologies.”
- PACo: A Novel Procrustes Application to Cophylogenetic Analysis (2013, methodology): “[25,26,27,28], including a Procrustes-based technique [29] similar to the one described herein.”
- Phylogenetic Relationships and Chromosome Number Evolution in Passiflora (2006, methodology): “A parametric bootstrap approach (SOWH test Swofford et al. 1996; Goldman et al. 2000) was utilized to determine whether single or multiple intron loss hypotheses were equally likely given our data.”
- MITOCHONDRIAL DNA PHYLOGENY OF BABBLERS (TIMALIIDAE) (2003, neutral): “under the maximum-likelihood criterion (Goldman et al. 2000)”
- Inferring Evolutionary Trees with PAUP* (2003, methodology): “Methods designed to do this—i.e., Templeton (1983), Kishino and Hasegawa (1989), and Shimodaira and Hasegawa (1999; see also Goldman et al., 2000) are also available in PAUP* and can be implemented using the options under the pscores and lscores commands.”
- CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection (2001, methodology): “…(Felsenstein, 1985), the Kishino–Hasegawa (KH) test (Kishino and Hasegawa, 1989), the Shimodaira–Hasegawa (SH) test (Shimodaira and Hasegawa, 1999; Goldman et al., 2000), the Weighted Shimodaira–Hasegawa (WSH) test (Shimodaira, 1993, 1998; Shimodaira and Hasegawa, 1999; Buckley et al., 2001),…”
- A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. (2008, background): “Although RELLs can also be used for likelihoodbased tests of topologies (Goldman et al., 2000), Waddell et al.”