Text messaging, personality, and the social context

By Thomas Holtgraves. 2011

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7acc33db2fd48708ee66684ebc18920eb4c4f41

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Lyle Ungar
2. Martin E. P. Seligman
3. H. A. Schwartz
4. David J. Stillwell
5. Johannes C. Eichstaedt
6. Michal Kosinski
7. Margaret L. Kern
8. Gregory J. Park

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Michal Kosinski
2. David J. Stillwell
3. Lyle Ungar
4. Martin E. P. Seligman
5. H. A. Schwartz
6. Johannes C. Eichstaedt
7. Margaret L. Kern
8. Gregory J. Park

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Lyle Ungar
2. Martin E. P. Seligman
3. H. A. Schwartz
4. David J. Stillwell
5. Johannes C. Eichstaedt
6. Michal Kosinski
7. Margaret L. Kern
8. Gregory J. Park

Citations in the corpus

• You are what you tweet: Personality expression and perception on Twitter (2012, background): “On average , each participant had 204.07 tweets (SD = 201.66) and Perceptual process, hear, exclusive Holtgraves (2011) Text message Personal pronoun, 1st person singular pronoun, impersonal pronoun (–), anxiety (–), anger (– ), sexuality, word expansion Negative emotion (–), anxiety (–), anger…”
• Texting while stressed: Implications for students’ burnout, sleep, and well-being. (2013, background): “…purposes, including relationship dissolution (Bergdall et al., 2012; Weisskirch & Delevi, 2012), content analyses have consistently pointed to relationship maintenance as their primary aim (Coyne, Stockdale, Busby, Iverson, & Grant, 2011; Faulkner & Culwin, 2005; Holtgraves, 2011; Thurlow, 2003).”
• Automatic personality assessment through social media language. (2015, methodology): “Closed-vocabulary methods have become particularly popular in recent analyses of social media language (Golbeck, Robles, & Turner, 2011; Holtgraves, 2011; Sumner, Byers, Boochever, & Park, 2012).”