Willingness to pay for a Green Energy program: A comparison of ex-ante and ex-post hypothetical bias mitigation approaches
By John C. Whitehead, Todd L. Cherry. 2007
197 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7a9c26a20dd2f71607e339cfad722a27d6cd73f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Michiel C. J. Bliemer
- John M. Rose
- Emily Lancsar
- Milad Haghani
- Harmen Oppewal
- Jackson Loomis
- Jana D. Groothuis
- Peter A. Groothuis
In General Decision Sciences
- John M. Rose
- Michiel C. J. Bliemer
- Jackson Loomis
- Jana D. Groothuis
- Emily Lancsar
- Peter A. Groothuis
- John C. Whitehead
- Milad Haghani
Citations in the corpus
- Green vs. green: Measuring the compensation required to site electrical generation windmills in a viewshed (2008, background): “Whitehead and Cherry (2007), using the contingent valuation method, find that individuals are willing to pay a premium to purchase green energy knowing that their choice leads to a cleaner environment.”
- Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Macro-scale analysis of literature and effectiveness of bias mitigation methods (2021, methodology): “Ex-post and ex-ante methods can be employed in combination as complements (Whitehead and Cherry, 2007).”
- Public Perceptions and Willingness to Pay for Renewable Energy: A Case Study from Greece (2018, background): “The countries with the largest installed photovoltaic rated power are Germany, Italy, USA, China, Japan, Spain, France, Belgium, Australia, and the Czech Republic.”
- Consumers' preference for renewable energy in the southwest USA (2011, methodology): “2002; Wiser, 2007; Yoo and Kwak, 2009; Zografakis et al., 2010).3 The survey-based CV method is viable to estimate the economic value of non-market goods and services with passive values (e.g. bequests to future generations) such as renewable energy (Menegaki, 2008; Whitehead and Cherry, 2007).”
- 2013WAEA Keynote Address: Strategies for Overcoming Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Surveys (2014, methodology): “Even combining ex ante and ex post approaches is feasible (Whitehead and Cherry, 2007).”
- Willingness to pay for drinking water quality improvement and the influence of social capital (2011, background): “Similarly, individual TP is influenced from the expectation of others people intention o contribute money (Wiser, 2007).”
- Eliciting Willingness to Pay without Bias using Follow-up Certainty Statements: Comparisons between Probably/Definitely and a 10-point Certainty Scale (2009, unknown): “Ex ante mitigation includes state of the art survey design that incorporates reminders of closely-related goods, especially substitutes, and reminders of the individual or household budget constraint, see Loomis et al. (1996) and Whitehead and Cherry (2007).”