Self- and Peer-Reported Personality: Agreement, Trait Ratability, and the “Self-Based Heuristic

By R. Ready, L. Clark, D. Watson, Kelley Westerhouse. 2000

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e78910cec0d195fb927483d3ed5d66cfc54afc40

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. E. Klonsky
2. Eric Turkheimer
3. Thomas F. Oltmanns
4. Michal Kosinski
5. David J. Stillwell
6. Youyou Wu
7. Matthew K. Nock
8. J. Chin

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. E. Klonsky
2. Thomas F. Oltmanns
3. Eric Turkheimer
4. David J. Stillwell
5. Michal Kosinski
6. J. Rohrer
7. Jonathan Haidt
8. Robert Plomin

Citations in the corpus

• Informant‐Reports of Personality Disorder: Relation to Self‐Reports and Future Research Directions (2006, result): “A study examining self/informant agreement on the 15 trait and temperament scales of the SNAP yielded a similar pattern of results (Ready et al., 2000).”
• Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans (2015, background): “Previous research has shown that people are fairly good at judging each other ’ s personalities (6 – 8); for example, even complete strangers can make valid personality judgments after watching a short video presenting a sample of behavior (9, 10).”