Informant‐Reports of Personality Disorder: Relation to Self‐Reports and Future Research Directions

By E. Klonsky, Thomas F. Oltmanns, Eric Turkheimer. 2006

308 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d63783baac0699d63c7b12f43c888e3e4475f38

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Eric Turkheimer
2. Thomas F. Oltmanns
3. Simon B. Sherry
4. Martin M. Smith
5. Katerina Rnic
6. M. Enns
7. T. Gralnick
8. Donald Saklofske

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Thomas F. Oltmanns
2. Eric Turkheimer
3. Simon B. Sherry
4. Martin M. Smith
5. Katerina Rnic
6. M. Enns
7. T. Gralnick
8. Donald Saklofske

Citations in the corpus

• Perceptions of Self and Others Regarding Pathological Personality Traits. (2006, methodology): “INFORMANTS Some studies of personality disorders have collected data from informants in addition to using self-report measures (see Klonsky et al., 2002 for a review).”
• Are Perfectionism Dimensions Vulnerability Factors for Depressive Symptoms after Controlling for Neuroticism? A Meta–analysis of 10 Longitudinal Studies (2016, background): “Mono-source designs are problematic when studying personality traits such as perfectionism that can involve self-presentational biases (e.g. defensively concealing imperfections from others; Klonsky & Oltmanns, 2002).”