Introducing a demand-based electricity distribution tariff in the residential sector: Demand response and customer perception
By Cajsa Bartusch, Fredrik Wallin, M. Odlare, Iana Vassileva, L. Wester. 2011
223 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e782b8ec28a7db774f54f589b0a8b554f65703d0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- M. Vallés
- Elta Koliou
Citations in the corpus
- Time-based pricing and electricity demand response: Existing barriers and next steps (2016, background): “An analysis of the project attributes some of the savings to prices that were set too low (Bartusch et al., 2011).”
- On demand: Can demand response live up to expectations in managing electricity systems? (2019, background): “PSE&G "Mypower Pricing" [140] New Jersey trial 2006 2007 539 Educate only, 424 automation technology, 450 control Sala Heby Energi Elnait AB [141,142] Sweden trial 2006 2012 159, but analysis of 95 due to technical issues SCE "DR contingency reserves demonstration" [16] California demonstration 2008”
- Dynamic electricity pricing - Which programs do consumers prefer? (2013, unknown): “However, so far, dynamic pricing is not common from the perspective of consumers and their market penetration is low (e.g. Bartusch et al. 2011 for Sweden, Moholkar et al. 2004 for US, Energate 2011 for Germany).”