Dynamic electricity pricing - Which programs do consumers prefer?

By E. Dütschke, Alexandra-Gwyn Paetz. 2013

210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c858084a24943543ca1eaee18e2f1012a13d1161

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Solar energy storage in German households: profitability, load changes and flexibility (2016, background): “Dütschke and Paetz (2013) conclude that customers are open for dynamic pricing, but simple programs are preferred.”
A survey on electricity market design: Insights from theory and real-world implementations of capacity remuneration mechanisms (2019, background): “, households have a fixed rate for energy consumption in combination with a base rate tariff (Dütschke and Paetz, 2013) and, thus, do not actively participate in the volatile wholesale market or show any reaction even to drastic prices changes (Cramton and Stoft, 2005).”
What makes consumers adopt to innovative energy services in the energy market? A review of incentives and barriers (2016, background): “The consumers usually don’t like to change their habits and do not accept any reduction in comfort of living [32,34].”
Residential Demand Response: Dynamic Energy Management and Time-Varying Electricity Pricing (2016, background): “, known a priori and predictable by the customers, time-varying pricing schemes coupled to automated management systems are considered in this study, a required condition for consumer acceptance [6].”
Internal and external barriers to energy efficiency: which role for policy interventions? (2019, background): “Dütschke and Paetz (2013) find that consumers prefer pricing programs characterized by lower spread of charges, so that they can avoid the risk of too high bills.”
Consumer demand for time of use electricity tariffs: A systematized review of the empirical evidence (2018, background): “However, the finding that real-time pricing tariffs and dynamic tariffs are less popular is broadly consistent with the results of individual studies which have systematically tested the impact of tariff design on uptake [15,17], including a study which was excluded from the meta-analysis because th”