Corporate governance and dividend policy in Southeast Asia pre- and post-crisis

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Impact of board gender diversity on dividend payments: Evidence from some emerging economies (2017, background): “…gender diversity may substitute for dividend payment, we add to the contentious literature investigating if board composition substitutes or complements the dividend policy as disciplining mechanism (e.g., AlNajjar & Hussainey, 2009; Bathala & Rao, 1995; Boumosleh & Cline, 2015; Sawicki, 2009).”
The Effect of Corporate Governance on Stock Liquidity: The Case of Thailand (2014, unknown): “This method is used in Sawicki (2009), who documents that governance quality in five Asian countries, Thailand included, has a significant impact on dividend policy.2 We employ three alternative measures of stock liquidity, i.e. Amihud's illiquidity, turnover, and liquidity ratio.”
Corporate governance and dividend pay-out policy in UK listed SMEs: The effects of corporate board characteristics (2017, unknown): “Based on this view, dividends pay-out can be used by poorly-governed firms as alternative governance mechanism to mitigate potential conflict of interest between managers and shareholders (Sawicki, 2009).”
Corporate Governance Quality and Earnings Management: Evidence from Jordan (2016, background): “The independent variable: corporate governance quality Corporate governance quality is measured based on governance index that used by (Sawicki, 2009; Prommin et al., 2012; Prommin et al., 2014) in measuring corporate governance quality.”