Biomass Feedstock Availability in the United States: 1999 State Level Analysis
By M. Walsh, R. L. Perlack, A. Turhollow, D. Ugarte, D. Becker, R. Graham, Stephen E. Slinsky, D. Ray. 2000
118 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7693e593e435b90cffd43538701b1c05feb0236
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Agronomy and Crop Science
Citations in the corpus
- A scenario based analysis of land competition between food and bioenergy production in the US (2007, methodology): “The cost of production for energy crops comes from Walsh et al. (2000).”
- Renewable Electricity Futures Study. Volume 1. Exploration of High-Penetration Renewable Electricity Futures (2012, methodology): “21 To be conservative, for each modeled year, the analysis used feedstock estimates from Walsh et al. (2000) and Milbrandt et al. (2005), which are consistent with the low end of the DOE (2011) estimate for 2030, and did not assume any increase in resource over time; on the other hand, the analysis…”
- Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS) (2011, background): “Source: Ventyx (2010) Figure 10 shows the capital cost supply curve of potential new hydropower capacity based on a resource assessment study (INL 2006).”
- Forest Biomass Supply in the Southeastern United States—Implications for Industrial Roundwood and Bioenergy Production (2009, methodology): “Other studies of biomass supply have assumed a technical recovery rate of 40% (Walsh et al. 2000), whereas this analysis assumes 50% of available residues will be used.”