The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Color and Luminosity Dependence of Galaxy Clustering at z ∼ 1
By A. Coil, J. Newman, Darren Croton, M. Cooper, M. Davis, S. Faber, B. Gerke, D. Koo, Nikhil Padmanabhan, Risa Wechsler and 1 more. 2007
203 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We present measurements of the color and luminosity dependence of galaxy clustering at z ∼ 1 in the DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey. Using volume-limited subsamples in bins of both color and luminosity, we find the following: (1) The clustering dependence is much stronger with color than with luminosity and is as strong with color at z ∼ 1 as is found locally. We find no dependence of the clustering amplitude on color for galaxies on the red sequence, but a significant dependence on color for galaxies within the blue cloud. (2) For galaxies in the range L/L* ∼ 0.7–2, a stronger large-scale luminosity dependence is seen for all galaxies than is seen for red and blue galaxies separately. The small-scale clustering amplitude depends significantly on luminosity for blue galaxies, with brighter samples having a stronger rise on scales rp < 0.5 h−1 Mpc. (3) Redder galaxies exhibit stronger small-scale redshift-space distortions (“fingers of god”), and both red and blue populations show large-scale distortions in ξ (rp,π) due to coherent infall. (4) While the clustering length, r0, increases smoothly with galaxy color (in narrow bins), its power-law exponent, γ, exhibits a sharp jump from the blue cloud to the red sequence. The intermediate-color “green” galaxy population likely includes transitional galaxies moving from the blue cloud to the red sequence; on large scales green galaxies are as clustered as red galaxies but show infall kinematics and a small-scale correlation slope akin to the blue galaxy population. (5) We compare our results to a semianalytic galaxy formation model applied to the Millennium Run simulation. Differences between the data and the model suggest that in the model star formation is shut down too efficiently in satellite galaxies.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e764dbfc43673664c257d34cb17699f39fe7a779
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- P. Hopkins
- L. Hernquist
- C. Conroy
- Simon D. M. White
- Volker Springel
- F. V. D. Bosch
- R. Somerville
- R. Dav'e
In Instrumentation
- P. Hopkins
- L. Hernquist
- C. Conroy
- Simon D. M. White
- F. V. D. Bosch
- R. Somerville
- R. Dav'e
- Thomas J. Cox
Citations in the corpus
- THE DEEP2 GALAXY REDSHIFT SURVEY: DESIGN, OBSERVATIONS, DATA REDUCTION, AND REDSHIFTS (2012, methodology): “…Galaxy-QSO clustering; QSOs cluster like blue galaxies, similar halo masses Conroy et al. (2007) Satellite motions; halo masses, mass-light ratios, stellar mass growth Coil et al. (2008) Definitive DEEP2 ξ(r) vs. color and luminosity Coil et al. (2009) Galaxy-AGN clustering; AGN cluster similarly…”
- The correlation of star formation quenching with internal galaxy properties and environment (2008, methodology): “Although this model accurately fits the global statistics of the galaxy population, the model predicts a red fraction of satellites that is much higher than observed (see also Baldry et al. 2006; Coil et al. 2008).”
- What determines satellite galaxy disruption (2009, background): “At z ∼ 1, the clustering results of Coil et al. (2008) imply that immediate star formation quenching at infall is likely too restrictive at higher redshift.”
- The VISTA deep extragalactic observations (VIDEO) survey (2012, background): “◦5 scales (e.g. Foucaud et al. 2007; Coil et al. 2008; Hartley et al. 2010).”
- Metallicities and Physical Conditions in Star-forming Galaxies at z ~ 1.0-1.5 (2008, background): “More generally, the associated space densities of both the blue DEEP2 galaxies (Coil et al. 2008) and UV-selectedz∼ 2 objects for which we have NIRSPEC spectra (Adelberger et al. 2005; Reddy et al. 2007) are significantly higher than that of the obscured AGN population featured in Daddi et al.…”
- HALO OCCUPATION DISTRIBUTION MODELING OF CLUSTERING OF LUMINOUS RED GALAXIES (2008, unknown): “…White et al. 1988; Park et al. 1994; Loveday et al. 1995; Guzzo et al. 1997; Benoist et al. 1996; Norberg et al. 2001; Zehavi et al. 2002, 2005b; Coil et al. 2006, 2008), color (e.g., Willmer et al. 1998; Brown et al. 2000; Zehavi et al. 2002, 2005b; Coil et al. 2008), and spectral type (e.g.,…”
- The colours of satellite galaxies in groups and clusters (2008, background): “Using DEEP2 data, Coil et al. (2008) have shown that a similar problem may exist at higher redshifts (z ∼ 0.7 − 0.9), where the semi-analytic models predict a stronger clustering of red galaxies than is observed.”
- The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS) - an unprecedented view of galaxies and large-scale structure at 0.5 < z < 1.2 (2013, methodology): “The most notable projects of this kind have been the VIMOS VLT Deep Survey (VVDS; Le Fèvre et al. 2005), the DEEP2 survey (Coil et al. 2008) and the zCOSMOS survey (Lilly et al. 2009), which adopted various strategies aimed at covering an extended redshift range, up to z ∼ 4.5.”
- A halo model of galaxy colours and clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (2008, result): “Since bimodality is also observed at z = 1, it would be interesting to see if our approach is similarly successful at interpreting the measurements of Coil et al. (2008) in the DEEP2 sample.”
- GALAXY CLUSTERING IN THE COMPLETED SDSS REDSHIFT SURVEY: THE DEPENDENCE ON COLOR AND LUMINOSITY (2010, methodology): “A similar depression of the cross-correlation below the geometric mean is observed by Coil et al. (2008).”
- Galaxy Zoo: Disentangling the Environmental Dependence of Morphology and Colour ⋆ (2008, background): “…der Wel 2008), and that galaxy colour is also correlated with the environment (e.g., Zehavi et al. 2005, Berlind et al. 2006, Cooper et al. 2008, Coil et al. 2008, Tinker et al. 2008, Wang et al. 2007, Skibba & Sheth 2009, Bamford et al. 2009; cf., Weinmann et al. 2006 and Skibba 2009 for the…”
- Galaxy evolution in groups and clusters: satellite star formation histories and quenching time-scales in a hierarchical Universe (2012, methodology): “…at fixed magnitude at z ≤ 1, based on halo occupation modeling of the spatial clustering and number densities of galaxy samples from the Classifying Objects by Medium-Band Observations (COMBO-17) (Phleps et al. 2006) and Deep Extragalactic Evolutionary Probe (DEEP2) (Coil et al. 2008) surveys.”
- The LABOCA survey of the Extended Chandra Deep Field-South: clustering of submillimetre galaxies (2011, methodology): “…real-space projected crosscorrelation is well detected on all scales from 0.1–15 h−1 Mpc, and the power-law fits return γ ∼ 1.8, similar to many previous correlation function measurements for galaxies (e.g. Zehavi et al. 2005; Coil et al. 2008) and QSOs (e.g. Coil et al. 2007; Ross et al. 2009).”
- The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design (2016, methodology): “ (at z<1:0). Large-Scale Structure Bias We estimate the linear clustering bias of our sample of ELGs relative to their dark matter halos using the DEEP2 data. Employing methods similar to those of [217] and [218], we have measured the clustering of ELGs at quasilinear scales of 1 10 h 1 Mpc in th”
- DEMOGRAPHICS AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF GAS OUTFLOWS/INFLOWS AT 0.4 < z < 1.4 (2012, background): “The halo masses of many of the galaxies in the high stellar mass tertile of the LRIS sample are likely above 1012 M⊙ based on either their clustering properties (Coil et al. 2008) or halo abundance matching (Behroozi, Conroy, and Wechsler 2010).”
- Red Galaxy Growth and the Halo Occupation Distribution (2008, result): “In Figure 5we plot the spatial clustering of z 0:8 red galaxies in Boötes (parameterized by r0) along with results from the recent literature at comparable redshifts (Brown et al. 2003; Wilson 2003; Meneux et al. 2006; Phleps et al. 2006; McCracken et al. 2008; Ross et al. 2007; Coil et al. 2008).”
- The DEEP3 Galaxy Redshift Survey: the impact of environment on the size evolution of massive early-type galaxies at intermediate redshift (2011, background): “…et al. 2011), and as many studies of environment and clustering at intermediate redshift have shown the star-forming population tends to reside in lower density regions relative to their passive counterparts (e.g. Cooper et al. 2006, 2007; Capak et al. 2007; Coil et al. 2008; Kovač et al. 2010).”