Does inbreeding affect the extinction risk of small populations?: predictions from Drosophila

By Rudolf Bijlsma, J. Bundgaard, A. Boerema. 2000

311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7545e8b21306bbbb3749653de2c761b9867185e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

Inbreeding, inbreeding depression and extinction (2008, background): “These investigations have used not only full-sib inbreeding, but have also found increased extinction risk with lower rates of inbreeding (Frankham 1995b; Reed et al. 2003), and in populations after purging had occurred (Bijlsma et al. 2000).”
Genetics and extinction (2005, unknown): “This has been verified in laboratory populations of Drosophila, houseflies and mice (Frankham, 1995b; Bijlsma et al., 1999, 2000; Reed and Bryant, 2000; Reed et al., 2002, 2003).”
Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments (2005, background): “Composite fitness — 1.23 Biotic Composite fitness — 0.94 Bijlsma et al (2000) Drosophila melanogaster Temp.”
Microevolutionary Response to Climatic Change (2004, background): “But purging may be efficient only under particular environmental conditions, and may not work under changing or stressful environmental conditions (e.g., Bijlsma et al., 2000; Kirstensen et al., 2003).”
The importance of immune gene variability (MHC) in evolutionary ecology and conservation (2005, background): “The loss of genetic variation can lead to short-term reduction of fitness components such as survival, reproductive output, growth rates and to impaired ability to adapt to long-term changes in the environment [7,9-13].”
Conservation genetics in a globally changing environment: present problems, paradoxes and future challenges (2007, background): “…range can produce fragmentations of the populations increasing the eVects of random genetic processes which can lead to a reduction of the eVective population size (Ne), of the genetic variability and of the evolutionary potential (Bijlsma et al. 2000; Hedrick 2000; Spielman et al. 2004a, b).”
Detecting bottlenecks using BOTTLENECK 1.2.02 in wild populations: the importance of the microsatellite structure (2010, background): “Even after recovering to their previous size, populations that have been through a bottleneck in their history are more prone to extinction (Bijlsma et al. 2000).”
Salmonid inbreeding: a review (2002, background): “mental stress becomes significantly greater for higher inbreeding levels (Bijlsma et al., 2000).”
Conservation genetics of population bottlenecks: the role of chance, selection, and history (2010, methodology): “…with only a few studies demonstrating a direct association between levels of genetic diversity, fitness, and extinction (e.g., Frankham 1995a; Newman and Pilson 1997; Saccheri et al. 1998; Bijlsma et al. 2000; Spielman et al. 2004; Hanski and Saccheri 2006; O’Grady et al. 2006; Vilas et al. 2006).”
Inbreeding and extinction: The effect of environmental stress and lineage (2002, background): “However, slower inbreeding also leads to elevated extinction risks (Frankham 1995b; Latter et al. 1995; Bijlsma et al. 2000; Reed and Bryant 2000).”
New markers—old questions: population genetics of seagrasses (2001, background): “When challenged by heat stress, genetically diverse populations experienced a lower risk of extinction than inbred ones (Bijlsma et al. 2000).”
INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2000, background): “For example,Drosophila have a very large effective population size, whereas in many endangered species, genetic drift is quite important either because of a currently small population size or because of past severe bottlenecks or founder events.”