Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments

By P. Armbruster, D. H. Reed. Heredity, 2005

623 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e1965ea691a8db3b66c5697a7fee08b800ee440

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management (2006, background): “A review of 34 studies of a range of taxa by Armbruster & Reed (2005) confirms this belief, showing an approximately 69% increase in inbreeding depression in stressful vs. benign environments.”
Adapting to climate change: a perspective from evolutionary physiology (2010, background): “Small population size can also lead to inbreeding, and inbreeding depression is often more severe under stressful environmental conditions (reviewed in Armbruster & Reed 2005).”
Conservation genetics of population bottlenecks: the role of chance, selection, and history (2010, background): “In a recent paper Armbruster and Reed (2005) reviewed 34 studies in which inbreeding depression was estimated as the number of lethal equivalents expressed at different levels of inbreeding and under different environmental conditions.”
Evolution of plant materials for ecological restoration: insights from the applied and basic literature (2017, background): “The environment of the restoration site may be stressful, and this can increase the expression of deleterious effects of inbreeding that may have accrued during the process of propagation (Armbruster & Reed 2005).”
Ex situ conservation genetics: a review of molecular studies on the genetic consequences of captive breeding programmes for endangered animal species (2011, background): “Fitness related effects of inbreeding (inbreeding depression) which have been reviewed before (e.g. Keller and Waller 2002; Boakes et al. 2007; Armbruster and Reed 2005) are not analysed here either.”
Advances in flowering phenology across the Northern Hemisphere are explained by functional traits (2018, background): “Self-pollination supports speciation (Levin & Wilson, 1976) and ensures competitive fitness between inter-compatible species (Fishman & Wyatt, 1999), but can also cause inbreeding depression (reviewed in Armbruster & Reed, 2005).”
Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential (2008, background): “Fragmentation can influence pollinator abundance and behaviour, leading to reduced outcrossing and higher inbreeding (Sampson et al. 1996; Armbruster and Reed 2005; Ward et al. 2005; Coates et al. 2007) while resource provisioning to developing seed can influence early acting traits such as seed…”
Mate Choice and Genetic Quality: A Review of the Heterozygosity Theory (2007, background): “Armbruster and Reed (2005) reviewed the literature to compare inbreeding depression in more or less stressful environments.”
Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations (2006, background): “Further, inbreeding depression is typically greater in more stressful wild environments than in more benign captive ones (Armbruster and Reed, 2005).”
The rough edges of the conservation genetics paradigm for plants (2006, background): “…C. Mix © 2006 The Authors Journal compilation © 2006 British Ecological Society, Journal of Ecology, 94, 1233–1248 Brook et al. 2002; Glemin et al. 2003; Armbruster & Reed 2005), the possibilities and limitations of the purging of genetic loads (e.g. Whitlock 2000; Crnokrak & Barrett 2002; Glemin…”