EVIDENCE FOR A GENERAL SPECIES–TIME–AREA RELATIONSHIP

By P. Adler, Ethan P. White, W. Lauenroth, Dawn M. Kaufman, A. Rassweiler, J. Rusak. 2005

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e74c064b8a9b0cf38f2f7d3cffc46a54aa75cdd7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Fidelity of variation in species composition and diversity partitioning by death assemblages: time-averaging transfers diversity from beta to alpha levels (2009, background): “…consistency in the resolution of samples is essential: the effect of decreasing temporal resolution on diversity can be strong, and, as in the species-time relationships in ecology (Harte and Kinzig 1997; Lennon et al. 2001; Adler et al. 2005), is not simply a consequence of increasing sample size.”
Implications of Time-Averaged Death Assemblages for Ecology and Conservation Biology (2013, background): “With increasing length of time or area sampled, species accumulate in an assemblage because the probability of immigration by species increases and new habitats or environmental conditions are added (Preston 1960, Adler & Lauenroth 2003, Adler et al. 2005).”
Stochastic and deterministic drivers of spatial and temporal turnover in breeding bird communities (2012, background): “For ecosystems in which environmental filtering is an important process, it is expected that higher habitat heterogeneity will lead to greater intra-specific aggregation (Brown et al., 1995) and spatial turnover (Anderson et al., 2006).”
Shapes and functions of species–area curves (II): a review of new models and parameterizations (2009, methodology): “Model (7) is the same as the ‘full’ species–time–area model used by Adler & Lauenroth (2003) and Adler et al. (2005).”
What ' s on the horizon for macroecology? (2012, background): “…thread in many current studies is the use of species distribution data linked to phylogenies (Winter et al. 2009, Cadotte et al. 2010), range size (McPherson et al. 2004, Morin and Chuine 2006), network theory (Cumming et al. 2010), or analyses of species richness patterns (Adler et al. 2005).”
Which function describes the species–area relationship best? A review and empirical evaluation (2009, background): “Journal compilation ª 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd themselves are unbiased (Adler et al., 2005).”
Warming leads to higher species turnover in a coastal ecosystem (2010, methodology): “The slope of the STR, which is an indicator of temporal turnover, has been shown to depend on the spatial scale of sampling (Adler et al., 2005), the organism group and ecosystem (White et al., 2006), as well as the sample and cumulative diversity (White et al., 2006; Shurin et al., 2007).”
Predicting the effects of increasing temporal scale on species composition, diversity, and rank-abundance distributions (2010, background): “Such accumulation is equivalent to STRs that describe community changes with increasing time span of sampling and with increasing numbers of sampled individuals (Preston 1960; Rosenzweig 1998; McKinney and Frederick 1999; Adler and Lauenroth 2003; Adler et al. 2005; White et al. 2006).”
Biodiversity change is uncoupled from species richness trends: Consequences for conservation and monitoring (2018, background): “Statistically, the rate of turnover in time will decrease with increasing spatial scale of sampling, reflecting a common species- time- area relationship, STAR (Adler & Lauenroth, 2003; Adler et al., 2005).”