Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity.
By Anthony D. Wagner, Daniel L. Schacter, Michael Rotte, W. Koutstaal, Anat Maril, A. M. Dale, B. Rosen, Randy L. Buckner. 1998
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Matthew D. Lieberman
- Olaf Sporns
- Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna
- Randy L. Buckner
- Stanislas Dehaene
- Russell A. Poldrack
- Hongkeun Kim
- Elizabeth A. Phelps
Citations in the corpus
- The Wick in the Candle of Learning (2008, unknown): “These regions are thought to be involved in successful verbal memory encoding (Brewer, Zhao, Desmond, Glover, & Gabrieli, 1998; Paller & Wagner, 2002; Wagner et al., 1998).”
- Dreaming and the brain: Toward a cognitive neuroscience of conscious states (2000, background): “…to activate during episodic and working memory tasks (Brewer et al. 1998; Cohen et al. 1997; Courtney et al. 1997; Fletcher et al. 1997; Tulving et al. 1996; Wagner et al. 1998); their deactivation in REM may contribute to the prominent mnemonic deficits in dreaming noted above in section 2.3.4.”
- Finding the Self? An Event-Related fMRI Study (2002, background): “Functional imaging studies have previously identified multiple regions within the left frontal cortex that show greater activation for elaborative semantic encoding of words than for nonsemantic, surface-based encoding of words (Wagner et al., 1998; Gabrieli et al., 1996; Demb et al., 1995; Kapur et”
- Working Memory Maintenance Contributes to Long-term Memory Formation: Neural and Behavioral Evidence (2005, methodology): “…and fusiform (BA 37) regions that have been identified in numerous previous studies of memory encoding (Davachi, Mitchell, et al., 2003; Ranganath, Yonelinas, et al., 2003; Davachi, Maril, & Wagner, 2001; Otten et al., 2001; Frey & Petrides, 2000, 2002; Brewer et al., 1998; Wagner et al., 1998).”
- Recovering meaning: left prefrontal cortex guides controlled semantic retrieval. (2001, background): “In contrast, a “low selection” et al., 1998; Wagner et al., 1998a; but see Asaad et condition required subjects to assess the global similaral., 1998), and on the particular mechanisms engaged ity between the cue (e.g., “flea”) and targets (e.g., “tick” during memory processing (Petrides, 1996;…”