Recovering meaning: left prefrontal cortex guides controlled semantic retrieval.
By Anthony D. Wagner, E. Juliana Paré-Blagoev, Jill Clark, Russell A. Poldrack. Neuron, 2001
951 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9feed6d0cc665357349916c54b572a9c96326291
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Vinod Menon
- Roel M. Willems
- Charan Ranganath
- M. L. Lambon Ralph
- Matthew D. Lieberman
- David Badre
- Mark D'Esposito
- Russell A. Poldrack
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Roel M. Willems
- Matthew H. Davis
- John Kounios
- Ingrid S. Johnsrude
- M. L. Lambon Ralph
- Mark Jung-Beeman
- Richard N. Henson
- Vinod Menon
Citations in the corpus
- Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes. (2004, background): “Although some findings suggest that different subregions of the left inferior frontal cortex may implement different encoding processes (Gold & Buckner, 2002; Wagner et al., 2001), analyses on activity within these regions did not reveal any reliable qualitative differences between contributions of ”
- Neuroimaging studies of priming. (2003, background): “, 1998), in particular, the control of retrieval of semantic information (Wagner et al., 2001).”
- Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. (2012, background): “In addition, inferior prefrontal cortex is thought to serve as conceptual working memory by guiding and controlling conceptual retrieval through attentional mechanisms (Kiefer et al., 2005; Schnur et al., 2009; Thompson-Schill et al., 1999; Wagner et al., 2001).”
- What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing?: Insights from a meta-analysis (2011, positive): “During semantic tasks F3opdR was also recruited when a manipulation of verbal material was needed such as during semantic selection tasks (Wagner et al., 2001) and semantic association between objects and subordinate-level words (Adams and Janata, 2002).”
- Hierarchical Processing in Spoken Language Comprehension (2003, background): “…we propose that a restricted portion of this activated area, the inferior frontal region in which responses were also correlated with intelligibility, contributes to the linguistic processes involved in accessing and combining word meanings (Thompson-Schill et al., 1997; Wagner et al., 2001).”
- Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax. (2007, neutral): “1998) and semantic retrieval (Badre et al., 2005; Bokde et al., 2001; Fletcher et al., 2000; Moss et al., 2005; Thompson-Schill et al., 1997; Thompson-Schill et al., 1999; Wagner et al., 2001).”
- Musical structure is processed in "language" areas of the brain: a possible role for Brodmann Area 47 in temporal coherence (2003, background): “, 1999), and specifically in the control of semantic retrieval (Wagner et al., 2001), the selection of semantic information (Thompson-Schill et al.”
- Rethinking the neurological basis of language (2005, methodology): “…for a simple lexical relatedness judgment, increasing the complexity by needing to find a related item among distractors or decreasing the degree of relationship appears to increase the activation of the right hemisphere homologues of the areas involved in the simpler task (Wagner et al., 2001).”