Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands

614 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Determinants of E-government Adoption: Testing the Mediating Effects of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use (2019, background): “Citizens decide to adopt e-government services by weighing its benefits and risks (Horst, Kuttschreuter, & Gutteling, 2007) and citizens who perceive the risk of internet to be high will be less likely to use e-government services (Carter & Bélanger, 2005).”
Adoption of e-government services in Turkey (2017, background): “There are many studies proving the positive effect of trust factor to the e-government adoption (Horst et al., 2007; B elanger & Carter, 2008; Akkaya, Obermeier, Wolf, & Krcmar, 2011; Shajari & Ismail, 2012; Khasawneh, Rabayah,& Abu-Shanab, 2013; Voutinioti, 2013).”
Personality and self reported mobile phone use (2008, background): “In contrast with the widespread acceptance of mobile phones, E-government does not enjoy the same levels of acceptance (Horst et al., 2007).”
An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA) (2017, background): “Realizing the significant benefits provided by e-government, particularly to citizens, a number of empirical studies have examined the adoption of such systems (e.g. Belanger & Carter, 2008; Horst et al., 2007; Hung et al., 2009; Lean et al., 2009; Wang & Liao, 2008; Wang & Shih, 2009).”