CONSENSUS IN LANDSCAPE PREFERENCE JUDGEMENTS
By C. Hagerhall. 2001
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6d5579bc467f5496ec6817fc964a0c5c28bfc3e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- Richard P. Taylor
- T. Purcell
- M. V. Winsum-Westra
- A. V. D. Berg
- C. Hagerhall
- Ethan A. McMahan
- D. Estes
- Robert Costanza
In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
- Richard P. Taylor
- T. Purcell
- M. V. Winsum-Westra
- A. V. D. Berg
- C. Hagerhall
- Ethan A. McMahan
- D. Estes
- A. Arnberger
Citations in the corpus
- Manicured, romantic, or wild? The relation between need for structure and preferences for garden styles (2010, background): “…used mostly to explain consensus i landscape preferences, such as the observation that people across different ethnic groups and cultures seem to prefer pastoral settings with an optimal balance between possibilities for understanding and exploration (Heerwagen and Orians, 1993; Hagerhall, 2001).”
- Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference (2004, methodology): “The original images and preference data used in this study come from previous landscape preference studies (Purcell et al., 1994; Peron, Purcell, Staats, Falchero, & Lamb, 1998; Hagerhall, 2000, 2001).”
- Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda (2012, background): “Differences in aesthetic preferences across individuals, demographic, ethnic, or other groups are commonly presumed, and differences in aesthetic ideals or the importance of aesthetics relative to other values have been demonstrated, especially in thecontextofculturallymodified landscapes (28, 29).”
- The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: A meta-analysis (2015, background): “Perhaps this is due to the fact that many managed natural environments, such as urban green spaces and arboretums, are designed to mimic those characteristics of wild nature that people find appealing, aesthetically pleasing, and restorative (see Appleton, 1975; Hagerhall, 2001; Kaplan, Kaplan, & Br”