Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference
By C. Hagerhall, T. Purcell, Richard P. Taylor. 2004
321 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Global and Planetary Change, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26ce5a8f0c18e9a92408c5be94b8fe4eb67698f3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Global and Planetary Change
- M. Tveit
- G. Fry
- Å. Ode
- Yannick Joye
- C. Hagerhall
- Carina Tenngart Ivarsson
- Richard P. Taylor
- T. Purcell
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character (2006, background): “For instance, studies have shown that preferences increase with increasing stewardship (Nassauer, 1997) and naturalness (Hägerhäll et al., 2004).”
- Architectural Lessons from Environmental Psychology: The Case of Biophilic Architecture (2007, background): “The affective value of fractal patterns can be explained by the finding that naturalness is a predictor of biophilic responses and by the fact that fractal geometry eminently captures this quality.”
- Capturing Landscape Visual Character Using Indicators: Touching Base with Landscape Aesthetic Theory (2008, background): “Another example are the concepts of complexity and naturalness, where complexity is used as a description of naturalness (e.g. Hagerhall et al., 2004; Purcell & Lamb, 1998).”
- Evolutionary Influence on Human Landscape Preference (2010, background): “Hagerhall, Purcell, and Taylor (2004) correlated the preference ratings of outdoor scenes in Sweden, northern Italy and Australia with fractal properties.”
- The perceived restorativeness of gardens – Assessing the restorativeness of a mixed built and natural scene type (2008, background): “For instance, attempts have been made to define naturalness by using measurable geometric properties (Hagerhall et al., 2004; Hagerhall, 2005).”
- A Review of Psychological Literature on the Health and Wellbeing Benefits of Biophilic Design (2015, background): “Although the respondents had the same overall preference, there were differences, with physicians providing overall higher ratings for the images than nurses [40].”