XMM-Newton observation of the Lockman Hole - II. Spectral analysis

By V. Mainieri, J. Bergeron, G. Hasinger, I. Lehmann, Piero Rosati, M. Schmidt, G. Szokoly, R. Tre, E. Observatory, I. D. Paris and 4 more. 2002

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present the results of the X-ray spectral analysis of the first deep X-ray survey with the XMM-Newton observa- tory during Performance Verification. The X-ray data of the Lockman Hole field and the derived cumulative source counts were reported by Hasinger et al. (2001). We restrict the analysis to the sample of 98 sources with more than 70 net counts (flux limit in the (0.5-7) keV band of 1:6 10 15 erg cm 2 s 1 ) of which 61 have redshift identification. We find no correlation between the spectral index and the intrinsic absorption column density NH and, for both the Type-1 and Type-2 AGN populations, we obtainh i' 2. The progressive hardening of the mean X-ray source spectrum with decreasing flux is essentially due to an increase in intrinsic absorption. The marked separation between the two AGN populations in several diagnostics diagrams, involving X-ray colour, X-ray flux, optical/near IR colour and optical brightness, is also a consequence of dierent absorption column densities and enables the classification of optically faint obscured AGN. The Type-2 and obscured AGN have weaker soft X-ray and optical fluxes and redder R K 0 colours. They follow the evolutionary tracks of their host galaxies in a color- redshift diagram. About 27% of the subsample with R K 0 colour are EROs (R K 0 5) and most of these 18 X-ray selected EROs contain an obscured AGN as revealed by their high X-ray-to-optical/near IR flux ratios. There are six sources in our sample with LX(0:5 10)> 10 44 erg s 1 and log(NH)> 10 22 cm 2 : which are likely Type-2 QSOs and we thus derive a density of69 objects of this class per square degree.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6b9635823fb3c8295ca0a2d87c26fad1b496b47

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. W. N. Brandt
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. P. Capak
  6. G. Hasinger
  7. A. Koekemoer
  8. Mara Salvato

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Richard J. Massey
  2. D. M. Alexander
  3. J. Trump
  4. A. Koekemoer
  5. F. E. Bauer
  6. D. Schneider
  7. W. N. Brandt
  8. C. Vignali

Citations in the corpus