Glomalin production by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus: a mechanism of habitat modification?

By Matthias C. Rillig, Peter D. Steinberg. 2002

278 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6b09cda87fcbd238fe69ca1accebbc02b32ef81

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Characterization of glomalin as a hyphal wall component of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (2005, background): “Habitat modification for improved growth of AMF hyphae may be an important factor (Rillig and Steinberg, 2002); however, GRSP has also been found in soils in which SOM is not involved in aggregate formation (Rillig et al.”
Arbuscular mycorrhizae, glomalin, and soil aggregation (2004, background): “Finally, IRSP production was also observed under soilfree, sterile in vitro conditions using transformed root organ cultures (in this case IRSP probably approaches glomalin; Rillig and Steinberg 2002).”
Changes in soil aggregation and glomalin-related soil protein content as affected by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species Glomus mosseae and Glomus intraradices (2009, methodology): “By contrast, regression analysis showed no correlation between GRSP and ERM extent, in agreement with previous reports (Rillig et al., 2001; Rillig and Steinberg, 2002; Rillig et al., 2002; Lutgen et al., 2003; Rillig et al., 2003; Lovelock et al., 2004), demostrating that GRSP cannot be considered ”
Using glomalin as an indicator for arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphal growth: an example from a tropical rain forest soil (2004, background): “However, as with ergosterol and fatty acids, the proportion of glomalin in fungal hyphae can be affected by environmental factors (Rillig and Steinberg, 2002) and can vary among fungal species and isolates (Wright et al.”
Impact of abiotic factors on development of the community of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the soil: a Review (2018, background): “The population and symbiotic activity of AMF, and thus a greater production of glomalin, can be increased both by modification of soil conditions promoting the propagation and activity of spores and by introduction of selected microorganisms into the rhizosphere which promote the process of mycorrhi”
The mosaic of habitats in the high-altitude Brazilian rupestrian fields is a hotspot for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (2012, background): “Several works have reported the importance of AMF for soil structure (Rillig and Steinberg, 2002; Rillig and Mummey, 2006), however there are no works which describe the influence of soil texture over diversity or even related to AMF occurrence.”
Arbuscular mycorrhizae and terrestrial ecosystem processes (2004, background): “GRSP production appears to be controlled by environmental factors (including aspects of physical growing space; Rillig & Steinberg 2002 ); numerous phenomenological studies are available that document GRSP pool changes, and frequently concomitant changes in soil aggregation, in response to a variet”
The role of glomalin in mitigation of multiple soil degradation problems (2020, methodology): “…Upadhyaya (1998). aThe EEG and TG terms were initially used as analogous to GRSP and BRSP. test is referred to as immunoreactive soil protein (IRSP) and subsequent operational terms based on the mode of extraction (e.g., EE-IRSP) (Rillig, 2004; Rillig & Steinberg, 2002; Wright & Upadhyaya, 1998).”
Chromium immobilization by extraradical mycelium of arbuscular mycorrhiza contributes to plant chromium tolerance (2016, background): “, 2013b), improve soil structure (Rillig and Steinberg, 2002), and even play an important role in maintaining plant biodiversity and ecosystem stability (van der Heijden et al.”
Soil‐mediated effects of invasive ungulates on native tree seedlings (2014, background): “…to soil structure in our greenhouse experiments, it is recognized that increased soil bulk density (i.e. reduced microporosity) can negatively affect mycorrhizal growth and root infection and transfer of nutrients to the plant (Nadian et al. 1998; Rillig & Steinberg 2002; Rillig & Mummey 2006).”
Interactions between soil structure and fungi (2004, unknown): “In vitro studies using glass beads of differing sizes have demonstrated that the quantitative amount of glomalin produced is sensitive to environmental conditions, with greater production induced under circumstances where habitat space is restricted ( Rillig & Steinberg, 2002 ).”
Spatial distribution of glomalin-related soil protein and its relationships with root mycorrhization, soil aggregates, carbohydrates, activity of protease and β-glucosidase in the rhizosphere of Citrus unshiu (2012, unknown): “Such variations between BRSPs and soil protease might also be attributed to glomalin itself, because glomalin is mixture of compounds and not a specific single molecule (Rillig and Steinberg, 2002), and the soil distribution of these various compounds possibly influences the activity of soil proteas”