Functions, commodities and environmental impacts in an ecological–economic model

By Sangwon Suh. 2004

334 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6aff74a31a0e44e2d8c11485b81ab0bf3cb5d70

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

1. Manfred Lenzen
2. G. P. Peters
3. T. Wiedmann
4. Edgar G. Hertwich
5. Richard Wood
6. D. Guan
7. E. Dietzenbacher
8. Arnold Tukker

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. G. P. Peters
2. T. Wiedmann
3. Robbie M. Andrew
4. Manfred Lenzen
5. J. Lennox
6. J. Barrett
7. Richard Wood
8. E. Dietzenbacher

In Strategy and Management

1. G. P. Peters
2. Manfred Lenzen
3. T. Wiedmann
4. Robbie M. Andrew
5. J. Barrett
6. Edgar G. Hertwich
7. Richard Wood
8. J. Lennox

Citations in the corpus

• APPROXIMATION AND REGIONAL AGGREGATION IN MULTI-REGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS FOR NATIONAL CARBON FOOTPRINT ACCOUNTING (2009, methodology): “A tiered hybrid LCA assumes that the A12 component (0 in equation (23)) is small relative to the rest of the system (Peters and Hertwich, 2006a; Suh, 2006).”
• THE INS AND OUTS OF WATER USE – A REVIEW OF MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND WATER FOOTPRINTS FOR REGIONAL SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS AND POLICY (2011, methodology): “Major methodological advances achieved include improved consistency in model format and structure, concordance between process and input– output (IO) systems, definition and coverage of processes and IO sectors, and allocation of detailed applications data to IO categories (Lenzen and Crawford, 2009”
• The Global MRIO Lab – charting the world economy (2017, methodology): “functional components in a fully automated build pipeline: (1) raw1 and processed data repositories; (2) a graphical user environment for the preparation of construction runs (see Geschke et al., 2011); (3) a constrained-optimisation matrix reconciliation engine (Lenzen et al., 2009); (4) a visual d”
• INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS (2009, positive): “CF applications can be extended considerably when employing a combination of gener-alised input–output models with process analysis (Bullard et al., 1978; Treloar, 1997; Joshi, 1998; Lenzen and Treloar, 2003; Suh et al., 2004; Suh, 2004; Peters and Hertwich, 2006c).”
• Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. (2009, methodology): “Suh (2004) integrated the matrix approaches of LCI (see, e.g., Heijungs, 1994; Heijungs and Suh, 2002) and IOA in a consistent computational framework forming the integrated hybrid approach (see Suh, 2006; Peters and Hertwich, 2006; Kondo and Nakamura, 2004).”
• The Role of Scale and Technology Maturity in Life Cycle Assessment of Emerging Technologies: A Case Study on Carbon Nanotubes (2015, methodology): “Also, the Comprehensive Environmental Data Archive (CEDA) (Suh 2005, 2010) was used to assess the contribution of the additional manufacturing machinery through a hybrid approach (Suh et al. 2004; Suh 2004).”
• Environmental Impacts of Consumption in the European Union:High‐Resolution Input‐Output Tables with Detailed Environmental Extensions (2006, methodology): “This step might be made more transparent by using integrated hybrid analysis (Suh 2004a), for which software has now become available (see article by Heijungs [2006] in this issue).”
• Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies (2014, background): “integrated the results of our foreground electricity production technologies back into the economy, as suggested in (22).”