The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management?

By Russell E. Glasgow, H. Mckay, J. Piette, K. Reynolds. Patient Education and Counseling, 2001

637 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6788fc0f50887c42d945f5095c5a790626bc4e1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Robert A. C. Ruiter
2. Gerjo Kok
3. Martin Camiré
4. Russell E. Glasgow
5. Julie C. Lowery
6. Laura J. Damschroder

In Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

1. Russell E. Glasgow

In General Health Professions

1. Laura J. Damschroder
2. Russell E. Glasgow
3. Julie C. Lowery
4. C. Bean
5. Gerjo Kok
6. Martin Camiré
7. Maria E. Fernandez
8. Robert A. C. Ruiter

Citations in the corpus

• Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. (2003, methodology): “Table 1 summarizes the key characteristics of well-designed efficacy and effectiveness trials, using the RE-AIM evaluation framework.(26,27) This model for evaluating interventions is intended to refocus priorities on public health issues, and it gives balanced emphasis to internal and external vali”
• Meta-Analysis: Chronic Disease Self-Management Programs for Older Adults (2005, methodology): “These suggestions included classifying the studies according to categories proposed in Kansas State University’s RE-AIM model (29), classifying the studies according to potential “essential elements” proposed by this group (30), and assessing whether the effectiveness of self-management programs var”
• Reimagining positive youth development and life skills in sport through a social justice lens (2021, background): “Such actionoriented research initiatives should then be evaluated to understand implementation, quality, outcomes, and impact, with frameworks such as knowledge to action (Graham et al., 2006) or RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance; Glasgow et al., 2001) offering ”
• Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science (2009, methodology): “The RE-AIM framework is used to guide comprehensive evaluation of interventions in terms of Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (sustainability) [85].”
• Implementation Mapping: Using Intervention Mapping to Develop Implementation Strategies (2019, background): “Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance, or RE-AIM, may help implementation strategy planners organize implementation outcomes at multiple levels including individual and organizational levels (56).”