Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension.

By Marcel Adam Just, P. Carpenter, J. Woolley. 1982

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Adaptive Computation Time for Recurrent Neural Networks (2016, methodology): “We speculate that the extra computation is used to make predictions about the next ‘chunk’ in the data (word, sentence, clause), much as humans have been found to do in self-paced reading experiments [16].”
The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English (2003, methodology): “To obtain an on-line record of the unfolding parse, we used the (noncumulative) moving-window technique described by Just, Carpenter, and Woolley (1982).”
Effects of reading span and plausibility in the reanalysis of wh-gaps by Chinese-English second language speakers (2010, methodology): “a Moving window experiment: The stimuli were displayed using a non-cumulative reading moving window technique (Just et al., 1982).”
Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head-final language (2004, unknown): “Participants were timed in a phrase-byphrase self-paced non-cumulative moving-window reading task ( Just, Carpenter, & Woolley, 1982 ).”