BLAME OR FATE, INDIVIDUAL OR SOCIAL?

By W. Oorschot, L. Halman. European Societies: The Official Journal of the European Sociological Association, 2000

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5fc316532772ad17b9b0b02e6077f9ee8fde322

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. D. Lepianka
2. Steffen Mau
3. Jos Gelissen
4. Wim van Oorschot

In Sociology and Political Science

1. D. Lepianka
2. Steffen Mau
3. Jos Gelissen
4. Wim van Oorschot
5. Ursula Dallinger
6. Jennifer E. Givens
7. Andrew K. Jorgenson

Citations in the corpus

• Popular Explanations of Poverty: A Critical Discussion of Empirical Research (2009, methodology): “Van Oorschot and Halman (2000) suggest that the four explanations reflect a typology of poverty attributions in which two dimensions are crossed: an individual−societal dimension, referring to whether the causes of poverty are seen to operate at the level of the individual or the society, and a…”
• Welfare Regimes and the Norms of Social Exchange (2004, background): “Thus, the relation between the evaluative and the cognitive level, on the one hand, and welfare regimes, on the other hand, is sometimes difficult to establish (see van Oorschot and Halman, 2000).”