Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in signed language

By Sherman Wilcox. 2004

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5fb5395d8b345c29c26d6031892047a39840cb9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Benjamin Anible
2. Jill P. Morford
3. Gabriella Vigliocco
4. Pamela Perniss
5. Robin L. Thompson
6. Erin Wilkinson
7. C. Occhino
8. Mark Dingemanse

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Benjamin Anible
2. Jill P. Morford
3. Gabriella Vigliocco
4. Pamela Perniss
5. Robin L. Thompson
6. Erin Wilkinson
7. C. Occhino
8. Mark Dingemanse

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Benjamin Anible
2. Jill P. Morford
3. Erin Wilkinson
4. C. Occhino

Citations in the corpus

• Iconicity is in the eye of the beholder: How language experience affects perceived iconicity (2017, methodology): “…organization and processing, we must revise our methods and our analyses to reflect what many researchers have been describing in theoretical work for several years (Cuxac & Sallandre, 2007; Pietrandrea, 2002; Pizzuto, Pietrandrea, & Simone, 2007; Russo, 2004; P. Wilcox, 2000; S. Wilcox, 2004).”
• Iconicity as a General Property of Language: Evidence from Spoken and Signed Languages (2010, background): “The role of iconicity has further received attention for its potential in shaping language structure and discourse in signed languages (Cuxac, 1999; Taub, 2001; Sallandre and Cuxac, 2002; Wilcox, 2004).”