Sex Differences in the Neurocognition of Language

By Michael T. Ullman, Robbin A. Miranda, M. Travers. 2007

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Declarative/Procedural Model (2020, background): “Here I lay out a number of these predictions, specifying where they are common to L1 and L2, and where they hold particularly for L2.”
Analyzing Reaction Times (2010, background): “Ullman and colleagues (Ullman et al., 2002; Ullman, 2007) have argued that females have an advantage in declarative memory, while males might have an advantage in procedural memory.”
Specific language impairment is not specific to language: the procedural deficit hypothesis. (2005, unknown): “…methods, including the following: testing for frequency effects (only memorized complex forms should show frequency effects, Drury and Ullman, 2002; Ullman et al., 2002; Ullman and Gopnik, 1994, 1999; van der Lely and Ullman, 2001); performing detailed phonetic analyses (explicit rules may yield…”
The cave of Shadows. Addressing the human factor with generalized additive mixed models (2015, background): “There are indications that males and females may be differentially sensitive to word frequency (Ullman et al., 2002; Balling and Baayen, 2008), but a gender by frequency interaction is not always found (Balling and Baayen, 2012; Tabak et al.”