Scale for resource selection functions

By M. Boyce. 2006

518 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5d6ad752f726278e0603345bb57e2ff33739a6f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

Resource Selection and Movements by Female Mule Deer Odocoileus hemionus: Effects of Reproductive Stage (2009, methodology): “We estimated RSFs using conditional logistic regression (Compton et al. 2002, Boyce 2006).”
Practical guidance on characterizing availability in resource selection functions under a use-availability design. (2013, background): “Instead studies typically compare used locations to availability samples drawn across differing spatial extents (Johnson 1980, Boyce et al. 2003, Boyce 2006), and interpret differences in coefficients as the behavioral response of the animal to habitats at different scales.”
Nowhere to hide: pumas, black bears, and competition refuges (2015, unknown): “Boyce MS. 2006.”
Seven Shortfalls that Beset Large-Scale Knowledge of Biodiversity (2015, unknown): “The lack of agreement between the resolution of environmental data and the area effectively used by a single population (i.e., the mean home range of a species; Dunning et al. 1995, Boyce 2006)—in addition to lack of information about microenvironmental variability within each locality (see McInerny”
Habitat selection by an Alpine ungulate: the significance of forage characteristics varies with scale and season (2009, unknown): “(Boyce 2006), and hierarchical, multiscale approaches are”
Foraging ecology of black bears in urban environments: guidance for human‐bear conflict mitigation (2015, background): “Selection is hierarchical in nature and can vary by spatial and temporal scales (Johnson 1980, Thomas and Taylor 1990, Boyce 2006).”
Do landscape heterogeneity and water distribution explain aspects of elephant home range in southern Africa's arid savannas? (2008, methodology): “However, the relatively high resolution (minimum mapping unit: 30 30 m pixels) of the maps we used made it possible to retain the differences in the patch type characteristics and therefore landscape heterogeneity, which may have been lost at lower resolutions (see Boyce, 2006).”
Temperature-mediated habitat use and selection by a heat-sensitive northern ungulate (2012, methodology): “In our study the available locations were sampled in relatively close proximity to the used locations, using distance moved between locations as a criterion (SSF; Fortin et al. 2005a; Boyce 2006).”
A spatial scale assessment of habitat effects on arthropod communities of an oceanic island (2009, background): “We also assume that the effect of a process is expected to be higher at one scale if it operates effectively (Boyce, 2006).”
The home-range concept: are traditional estimators still relevant with modern telemetry technology? (2010, background): “The need will remain to find the appropriate spatial scales for defining availability when making inferences at individual and population levels (Johnson 1980; Boyce 2006; Fryxell et al. 2008; Fieberg et al. 2010), and utilization distributions offer one objective approach towards this end (Johnson ”
Corridors for Conservation: Integrating Pattern and Process (2006, background): “These models can be used to identify habitat associations for animals at multiple scales (e.g., Boyce 2006, Carroll et al. 2001).”
Habitat Selection at Multiple Scales (2009, background): “In principle, resource selection functions (predictive models of selection) can incorporate decision rules across an array of measurement scales (see Boyce, 2006).”
Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis (2010, background): “Habitat suitability models require presence or presence-absence data (Boyce 2006; Pearce & Boyce 2006) and the habitat suitability values generated for each pixel across the landscape can then be converted directly into resistances (i.e. if model values ranged from 0 to 100, the resistance could be…”