The home-range concept: are traditional estimators still relevant with modern telemetry technology?

By J. Kie, Jason Matthiopoulos, J. Fieberg, Roger A. Powell, Francesca Cagnacci, M. S. Mitchell, J. Gaillard, P. Moorcroft. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2010

556 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87bff515943634965028b9ff5a7841c238103c2a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Female tiger Panthera tigris home range size and prey abundance: important metrics for management (2014, background): “Choice of home range estimators depends on the question being addressed (Kie et al., 2010) and therefore we calculated home range as both the 95 and 100% MCPs (Smith et al., 1987; Chundawat et al., 1999; Karanth & Sunquist, 2000; Goodrich et al., 2010; Barlow et al., 2011).”
Human development and climate affect hibernation in a large carnivore with implications for human–carnivore conflicts (2018, methodology): “To minimize the effects of over- smoothing, we calculated the utilization distribution based on 80% of the reference bandwidth (href; Kie et al., 2010) using the r package adehabitatHR (Calenge, 2006).”
Population-specific home ranges and migration timing of Pacific Arctic beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) (2014, background): “Kernel density estimators provide a nonparametric probability of using a given point in space and are reliably used to define the utilization distribution, or home range, for marine and terrestrial wildlife (Kie et al. 2010).”
Location based services: ongoing evolution and research agenda (2018, background): “Several early studies have investigated GPS sample rates for developing pedestrian assistant systems (e.g. Schneider et al. (2016)) and animal home range analysis in movement ecology (e.g. Kie et al. (2010)), but little research attention has been paid to other aspects and domains mentioned above.”
Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges (2010, methodology): “…that includes mechanistic approaches to understanding home range formation (Mitchell & Powell 2004; Moorcroft & Lewis 2006; Van Moorter et al. 2009; Kie et al. 2010; Smouse et al. 2010), assessing the effect of memory on orienting or limiting movement (Gautestad & Mysterud 2006; Dalziel et al.…”
What Is the Proper Methodto Delineate Home Range of anAnimal Using Today’s AdvancedGPS Telemetry Systems: The Initial Step (2011, unknown): “Use of BBMM or KDE is dependent on study objectives and should not be considered a similar method to an end result as previously suggested (Kie et al., 2010).”
Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology (2010, background): “statistical rigour; union of movement, resource selection and home range dynamics Moorcroft & Lewis (2006); Kie et al. (2010)”
Home range size of adult Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in a coastal and estuarine system is habitat and sex-specific (2016, methodology): “…identified distributions via simple outlines encompassing the area of use, i.e., minimum convex polygon (Mohr 1947), to methods that describe utilization distribution, which examine the intensity of use of different locations within a home range or study area (Van Winkle 1975, Kie et al. 2010).”
What makes fish vulnerable to capture by hooks? A conceptual framework and a review of key determinants (2017, background): “For example, a RW can delineate home ranges of fish (e.g., Alós et al., 2016; Palmer, Balle, March, Alós, & Linde, 2011; Pedersen & Weng, 2013) because fish frequently move predictably within a discrete home range area (Fagan et al., 2013; Kie et al., 2010).”