Signalers and Receivers: Mechanisms and Evolution of Arthropod Communication

By Michael D Greenfield. 2002

402 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5cde24093d07b2799f531d46a86f013cb45cb8b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Seismic communication and mate choice in wolf spiders: components of male seismic signals and mating success (2008, background): “Substratumcoupled vibration (seismic communication) is not subject to the same constraints as airborne acoustic signals, that is, even very small animals such as spiders can create very low-frequency signals via a substrate, and is far more widespread as a means of communication than previously thou”
The Behavioral Ecology of Anuran Communication (2007, background): “Rather than being a manifestation of male–male cooperation, synchrony sometimes may result from male–male competition for females (Greenfield 2002).”
Insect duets: underlying mechanisms and their evolution (2003, methodology): “In such cases it is only males that call, and mute females search for and choose between potential mates on the basis of longer bouts of calling, call length, signals repeated at a higher rate or loudness (for a useful review see Greenfield, 2002).”
Lack of innate preference for morph and species identity in mate-searching Enallagma damselflies (2007, background): “Perhaps because copulation is so fundamental to fitness, reproductive behavior among insects often involves stereotypic responses elicited by species-specific cues, such as unique pheromone mixes or auditory calls (e.g., Jacobson 1972; Charlton et al. 1993; Phelan 1997; Greenfield 2002; Gemeno and S”
The effect of signal complexity on localization performance in bats that localize frog calls (2008, unknown): “…cue to find the male frog, the three receivers have distinctly different auditory systems and different mechanisms for sound localization (frogs: Narins 1990; Gerhardt & Huber 2002; flies: Robert et al. 1992; Römer & Tautz 1992; Greenfield 2002; bats: Popper & Fay 1995; Brown & May 2005).”
Multimodal communication of wolf spiders on different substrates: evidence for behavioural plasticity (2011, background): “Animal signalling behaviours are selected for successful transmission and accurate reception (Endler 1992; Endler & Basolo 1998; Greenfield 2002), and some species have evolved signals that function best in specific environments by matching signals and transmission characteristics of the…”
Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems : crustaceans as model organisms (2007, background): “However, communication is not only the generation and transmission of signals by the sender and their reception by the receiver, but also includes neural processes that lead to beneficial behavioral responses (Greenfield 2002).”
Polymorphic signals of harassed female odonates and the males that learn them support a novel frequency-dependent model (2004, background): “0:01. recognizable via a male's motion detector neurons (Olberg & Worthington 2000) at speeds and distances greater than those over which colours can be detected (see Greenfield 2002).”
Disruption of the reproductive behaviour of Scaphoideus titanus by playback of vibrational signals (2009, background): “Pair-formation is the basis of sexual behaviour and insects use a variety of signalling mechanisms to establish a contact with a suitable partner (reviewed in Greenfield, 2002).”
Mechanisms and Evolution of Communal Sexual Displays in Arthropods and Anurans (2005, background): “, 2000), and in some species vibration‐sensitive receptors are anatomically associated with the tympanal ears that detect airborne sound (Greenfield, 2002).”
Genotype–environment interaction and the reliability of mating signals (2004, background): “These findings include observations of female choice in species where males do not provide direct benefits (Møller & Alatalo 1999), retention of additive genetic variance for male signal and female preference traits (Bakker & Pomiankowski 1995; Jang & Greenfield 2000; Greenfield 2002; Rodriguez & Gr”