Mechanisms and Evolution of Communal Sexual Displays in Arthropods and Anurans

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The “Cocktail Party Problem”: What Is It? How Can It Be Solved? And Why Should Animal Behaviorists Study It? (2008, background): “Keywords: acoustic communication, animal communication In many animals, acoustic communication occurs in large groups or aggregations of signaling individuals (Gerhardt & Huber, 2002; Greenfield, 2005; Kroodsma & Miller, 1996; McGregor, 2005; this issue).”
The Behavioral Ecology of Anuran Communication (2007, background): “In fact, computer modeling has demonstrated that “inhibitory-resetting” of calltiming and also selective attention may be favored by selection when female mate choice is biased by a precedence effect (Greenfield, 2005).”
Animal Communication and Noise (2013, background): “Malay Nat J 48:297–305 Greenfield MD (1983) Reproductive isolation in clearwing moths (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae): a tropical-temperate comparison. Ecology 64(2):362–375 Greenfield MD (1988) Interspecific acoustic interactions among katydids Neoconocephalus: inhibition-induced shifts in diel periodicity”
The evolution of the Lombard effect: 100 years of psychoacoustic research (2011, background): “Moreover, like many frog species, insects often call in aggregations, in which males mutually mask their signals (Greenfield, 2005), and in such chorusing species a Lombard effect would quickly escalate, driving all males of the aggregation to signal at maximum levels.”