Contractor prequalification model using fuzzy sets
By Edyta Plebankiewicz. 2010
120 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Contractor prequalification makes it possible to admit for tendering only competent contractors. The undertaken decisions demand taking into consideration many criteria, including among others, experience and financial standing of the candidates. It is often difficult to be quantified. The objectives of the construction owner in a given project are also meaningful. All these factors cause difficulties in working out a mathematical prequalification model. In the paper a model based on fuzzy sets theory is proposed. It takes into consideration both different criteria, objectives and evaluations of numerous decision ‐ makers. To illustrate the model operation a simple numerical example is presented.
Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5adaefa5acd26f4e4df8352887b77f529bc5d61
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
- Zenonas Turskis
- Jolanta Tamosaitiene
- Abbas Mardani
- Norhayati Zakuan
- Kannan Govindan
- Martin Brandt Jepsen
- Ahmad Jusoh
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Zenonas Turskis
- Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
- Jolanta Tamosaitiene
- Abbas Mardani
- Ahmad Jusoh
- Tomas Balezentis
- Alvydas Balezentis
- Norhayati Zakuan
Citations in the corpus
- A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making (2010, background): “…develop dynamically (Kapliński 2008c; Peldschus 2008; Ginevičius and Podvezko 2008..., a, b; Zavadskas et al. 2008c; Ustinovichius et al. 2007; Plebankiewicz 2009; Ulubeyli and Kazaz 2009; Jakimavicius and Burinskiene 2009; Šijanec Zavrl et al. 2009; Sobotka and Rolak 2009; Selih et al. 2008;…”
- The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS (2011, unknown): “2005; Ginevicius 2008; Ginevicius, Podvezko 2004; Ulubeyli, Kazaz 2009; Kaklauskas et al. 2007; Kracka et al. 2010; Liaudanskiene et al. 2009; Plebankiewicz 2009; Podvezko 2007, 2009; Podvezko, Podviezko 2010; Selih et al. 2008; Turskis et al. 2009; Ustinovichius et al. 2007; Urbanavicienė et al.…”
- Risk assessment of construction projects (2010, methodology): “There is a wide range of methods (Ulubeyli and Kazaz 2009; Jakimavicius and Burinskiene 2009a, b; Plebankiewicz 2009; Liaudanskiene et al. 2009; Liu 2009; Dytczak and Ginda 2009; Podvezko 2009) based on multi-criteria utility theory: SAW – Simple Additive Weighting (Ginevičius et al.”