Hollow futures? Tree decline, lag effects and hollow‐dependent species

By A. Manning, Phillip B. Gibbons, Joem Fischer, D. Oliver, David B. Lindenmayer. 2013

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/171c697e97fe1f8fa26b254088a3d0b88ddf805f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. David B. Lindenmayer
2. R. Mac Nally
3. J. Thomson
4. Richard J. Hobbs
5. A. Bennett
6. Tara G. Martin
7. Carla P. Catterall
8. Atte Moilanen

In Global and Planetary Change

1. David B. Lindenmayer
2. Atte Moilanen
3. A. Bennett
4. Hugh P. Possingham
5. R. Mac Nally
6. K. Wilson
7. Martine Maron
8. Carla P. Catterall

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. David B. Lindenmayer
2. R. Mac Nally
3. J. Thomson
4. A. Bennett
5. Richard J. Hobbs
6. Tara G. Martin
7. J. L. Reid
8. Carla P. Catterall

Citations in the corpus

• Avifaunal disarray due to a single despotic species (2013, background): “…noisy miners now pervade many landscapes (Oldland et al., 2009), the scattered paddock trees that increase the probability of noisy miners occupying adjacent woodland (Taylor et al., 2008) are also being lost through intensification of agriculture (Maron & Fitzsimons, 2007; Manning et al., 2013).”
• Integrating plant- and animal-based perspectives for more effective restoration of biodiversity (2016, background): “For animals, restoration goals generally emphasize individual species and their habitat needs rather than community structure and composition (Albrecht et al. 2010 ; Manning et al. 2013 ).”