Integrating plant- and animal-based perspectives for more effective restoration of biodiversity

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

When good animals love bad restored habitats: how maladaptive habitat selection can constrain restoration (2017, background): “Restoration for animals generally focuses on individual species and their habitat needs (McAlpine et al. 2016), often in terms of considering these within the wider landscape, such as to enhance functional connectivity (Thomson et al.”
Links between community ecology theory and ecological restoration are on the rise (2018, background): “In addition, Brudvig (2011) and McAlpine et al. (2016) noted that restoration journals were dominated by studies concerning plant communities in terrestrial ecosystems.”
Species richness change across spatial scales (2019, background): “11 Gains are likewise highly scale-dependent and result from the recolonization of previously 12 extirpated species (e.g., McAlpine et al. 2016), range expansions (via climate change and 13 human modification of habitat) (e.g., Batt et al. 2017), and/or introductions of species into their 14…”