The Problem of False Confessions in the Post-DNA World
By Steven A. Drizin, R. Leo. 2004
431 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e558f380a2ac82301cc6a4a4f5e68039791483bc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Samuel R. Gross
- Iris Blandón-Gitlin
- Katheryn Sperry
- R. Leo
Citations in the corpus
- Criminal versus HUMINT Interrogations: The Importance of Psychological Science to Improving Interrogative Practice (2010, unknown): “Unfortunately, research has demonstrated that innocent individuals can be wrongfully convicted, sometimes on the basis of a false confession provided to police (Drizin & Leo, 2004).”
- Jurors believe interrogation tactics are not likely to elicit false confessions: will expert witness testimony inform them otherwise? (2011, background): “Virtually every reported police-induced false confession has contained false evidence ploys (Drizin & Leo, 2004; Kassin, 2008b; Leo & Ofshe, 1998).”
- Convicting the Innocent (2008, background): “Drizin and Leo (2004) report on 125 proven false confessions, 44 of which led to false convictions; 35% were by suspects under the age of 18.”